• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄期极早产儿的智力发育结果。

Intellectual outcomes of extremely preterm infants at school age.

作者信息

Asami Maya, Kamei Atsushi, Nakakarumai Misato, Shirasawa Satoko, Akasaka Manami, Araya Nami, Tanifuji Sachiko, Chida Shoichi

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.

出版信息

Pediatr Int. 2017 May;59(5):570-577. doi: 10.1111/ped.13215. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1111/ped.13215
PMID:27935152
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The survival rate of extremely preterm (EP) infants (<28 weeks of gestation) has improved dramatically, and there is great interest in the long-term prognosis. The aim of this study was to elucidate the influence of prenatal and postnatal care on long-term intellectual outcome in EP infants.

METHODS

Subjects were EP infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from 1982 to 2005. The survival rate and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6 years of age were analyzed for the periods 1982-1991 (period 1) and 1992-2005 (period 2). Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine risk factors for intellectual impairment.

RESULTS

Survival rate improved significantly from 84.5% (period 1) to 92.4% (period 2; P = 0.007). Follow-up data were obtained from 92 children in period 1 (69.7% of survivors) and from 245 in period 2 (72.3% of survivors). The incidence of intellectual impairment increased from 16.3% (period 1) to 31.0% (period 2). Significant factors associated with intellectual impairment were period 2 (OR, 3.53; P = 0.007), supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' corrected age (OR, 2.22; P = 0.012), number of days in the hospital (OR, 1.01; P = 0.012), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH; OR, 3.05; P = 0.024), and later tube-feeding commencement date (OR, 1.10; P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in survival rate, the rate of intellectual impairment increased in period 2. According to risk factor analysis, reducing the incidence of chronic lung disease and/or apnea, IVH, and nutritional deprivation is a key factor in improving the intellectual outcomes of EP infants.

摘要

背景

极早产儿(孕周<28周)的存活率已显著提高,人们对其长期预后极为关注。本研究旨在阐明产前和产后护理对极早产儿长期智力发育结局的影响。

方法

研究对象为1982年至2005年入住新生儿重症监护病房的极早产儿。分析了1982 - 1991年(第1阶段)和1992 - 2005年(第2阶段)的存活率及6岁时的神经发育结局。进行逻辑回归分析以检查智力障碍的危险因素。

结果

存活率从第1阶段的84.5%显著提高至第2阶段的92.4%(P = 0.007)。第1阶段从92名儿童(占存活者的69.7%)获得随访数据,第2阶段从245名儿童(占存活者的72.3%)获得随访数据。智力障碍的发生率从第1阶段的16.3%增至第2阶段的31.0%。与智力障碍相关的显著因素为第2阶段(比值比[OR],3.53;P = 0.007)、矫正年龄36周时吸氧(OR,2.22;P = 0.012)、住院天数(OR,1.01;P = 0.01)、脑室内出血(IVH;OR,3.05;P = 0.024)以及较晚开始管饲的日期(OR,1.10;P = 0.032)。

结论

尽管存活率有所提高,但第2阶段智力障碍发生率上升。根据危险因素分析,降低慢性肺病和/或呼吸暂停、IVH以及营养缺乏的发生率是改善极早产儿智力发育结局的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Intellectual outcomes of extremely preterm infants at school age.学龄期极早产儿的智力发育结果。
Pediatr Int. 2017 May;59(5):570-577. doi: 10.1111/ped.13215. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
2
School-age outcomes of extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children.极早产儿或极低出生体重儿的学龄期结局。
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):e1053-61. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2311. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
3
Changes in long-term prognosis with increasing postnatal survival and the occurrence of postnatal morbidities in extremely preterm infants offered intensive care: a prospective observational study.在提供强化护理的极早产儿中,随着出生后存活率的提高和出生后并发症的发生,长期预后的变化:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Dec;2(12):872-879. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30287-6. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Trends in the incidence and associated factors of late-onset sepsis associated with improved survival in extremely preterm infants born at 23-26 weeks' gestation: a retrospective study.23-26 孕周极早产儿晚发型败血症发病趋势及其与存活率提高的相关因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 May 23;18(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1130-y.
5
Impact of intraventricular hemorrhage on cognitive and behavioral outcomes at 18 years of age in low birth weight preterm infants.脑室内出血对低出生体重早产儿18岁时认知和行为结局的影响。
J Perinatol. 2015 Jul;35(7):511-5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.244. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
6
Outcomes of intraventricular hemorrhage and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants born to residents of Nova Scotia from 1993 to 2010.1993年至2010年新斯科舍省居民所生极早产儿基于人群队列中的脑室内出血及出血后脑积水的结局
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Jun;15(6):580-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.PEDS14364. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
Treatment outcomes and associated factors among extremely preterm infants in a major children hospital in Guangxi, China.中国广西一家大型儿童医院中极早产儿的治疗结局及相关因素
Pediatr Neonatol. 2018 Jun;59(3):263-266. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age among infants of less than 25 weeks' gestational age born in 1993-1999.1993 - 1999年出生的孕周小于25周的婴儿在矫正年龄18至22个月时神经发育结局的变化。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1645-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2215.
9
Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden.瑞典积极围产期护理后极低出生体重儿 2.5 岁时的神经发育结局。
JAMA. 2013 May 1;309(17):1810-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3786.
10
Neurodevelopmental outcome after extreme prematurity: a review of the literature.极早早产儿的神经发育结局:文献综述
Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Feb;52(2):143-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Gestational age and risk of intellectual disability: a population-based cohort study.胎龄与智力障碍风险:基于人群的队列研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Sep;107(9):826-832. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323308. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Preterm nutrition and neurodevelopmental outcomes.早产营养与神经发育结局
World J Methodol. 2021 Nov 20;11(6):278-293. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i6.278.
3
Impact of bundle implementation on the incidence of peri/intraventricular hemorrhage among preterm infants: a pre-post interventional study.
捆绑式干预方案对早产儿围生期/脑室周围出血发生率的影响:一项干预前后的研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2021 May 10;139(3):251-258. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0412.R1.28012021. eCollection 2021.