Koponen Marjaana, Taipale Heidi, Lavikainen Piia, Tanskanen Antti, Tiihonen Jari, Tolppanen Anna-Maija, Ahonen Riitta, Hartikainen Sirpa
Kuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(1):107-118. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160671.
We aimed to analyze the risk of non-cancer mortality according to duration of antipsychotic use and to compare the risk associated with polypharmacy and monotherapy among community-dwellers with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The risk of mortality between most frequently used antipsychotic drugs was compared. Data from a nationwide register-based MEDALZ study that included all 70,718 community-dwellers newly diagnosed with AD during 2005-2011 in Finland was utilized. Death, excluding cancer as direct cause of death, was extracted from Causes of Death Register. Incident antipsychotic use was compared with time without antipsychotics with Cox proportional hazard models. Antipsychotic use was associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.61; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.53-1.70). The absolute difference in mortality rate was 4.58 (95% CI 4.53-4.63) deaths per 100 person-years. The risk of mortality was increased from the first days of use and attenuated gradually but remained increased even after two years of use (aHR 1.30; 95% CI 1.16-1.46). Compared with nonuse, antipsychotic polypharmacy (aHR 2.88; 95% CI 2.38-3.49) was associated with an increased risk of mortality than monotherapy (aHR 1.57; 95% CI 1.49-1.66). Haloperidol was associated with higher risk of mortality (aHR 1.52; 95% CI 1.14-2.02) and quetiapine with lower risk (aHR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75-0.94) compared with risperidone. In conclusion, the findings support current treatment guidelines on having a high threshold for antipsychotic initiation among persons with AD. Antipsychotic polypharmacy and long-term use should be avoided and drug choice should be weighed against risk/benefit evidence.
我们旨在根据抗精神病药物的使用时长分析非癌症死亡风险,并比较阿尔茨海默病(AD)社区居民中联合用药与单一用药的相关风险。比较了最常用抗精神病药物之间的死亡风险。利用了基于全国登记册的MEDALZ研究数据,该研究纳入了2005年至2011年期间芬兰所有70718名新诊断为AD的社区居民。从死亡原因登记册中提取排除癌症作为直接死亡原因的死亡数据。使用Cox比例风险模型将抗精神病药物的起始使用与未使用抗精神病药物的时间段进行比较。抗精神病药物的使用与死亡风险增加相关(调整后风险比[aHR]为1.61;95%置信区间[CI]为1.53 - 1.70)。死亡率的绝对差异为每100人年4.58例死亡(95% CI为4.53 - 4.63)。死亡风险从使用的第一天起就增加,并逐渐减弱,但即使在使用两年后仍保持增加(aHR为1.30;95% CI为1.16 - 1.46)。与未使用相比,抗精神病药物联合用药(aHR为2.88;95% CI为2.38 - 3.49)比单一用药(aHR为1.57;95% CI为1.49 - 1.66)的死亡风险增加。与利培酮相比,氟哌啶醇的死亡风险更高(aHR为1.52;95% CI为1.14 - 2.02),喹硫平风险较低(aHR为0.84;95% CI为0.75 - 0.94)。总之,研究结果支持当前关于AD患者抗精神病药物起始使用门槛较高的治疗指南。应避免抗精神病药物联合用药和长期使用,药物选择应权衡风险/获益证据。