• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎膜早破后超声评估胎儿体重:不同公式的比较

Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasonography after preterm premature rupture of membranes: comparison of different formulas.

作者信息

Esin Sertac, Hayran Mutlu, Tohma Yusuf Aytac, Guden Mahmut, Alay Ismail, Esinler Deniz, Yalvac Serdar, Kandemir Omer

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):253-266. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0258.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2016-0258
PMID:27935855
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare different ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in predicting the fetal birth weight of preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) fetuses.

METHODS

Based on the ultrasonographic measurements, the estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated according to the published formulas. The comparisons used estimated birth weight (EBW) and observed birth weight (OBW) to calculate the mean absolute percentage error [(EBW-OBW)/OBW×100], mean percentage error [(EBW-OBW)/OBW×100)] and their 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

There were 234 PPROM patients in the study period. The mean gestational age at which PPROM occured was 31.2±3.7 weeks and the mean gestational age of delivery was 32.4±3.2 weeks. The mean birth weight was 1892±610 g. The median absolute percentage error for 33 formulas was 11.7%. 87.9% and 21.2% of the formulas yielded inaccurate results when the cut-off values for median absolute percentage error were 10% and 15%, respectively. The Vintzileos' formula was the only method which had less than or equal to 10% absolute percentage error in all age and weight groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For PPROM patients, most of the formulas designed for sonographic fetal weight estimation had acceptable performance. The Vintzileos' method was the only formula having less than 10% absolute percentage error in all gestational age and weight groups; therefore, it may be the preferred method in this cohort. Amniotic fluid index (AFI) before delivery had no impact on the performance of the formulas in terms of mean percentage errors.

摘要

目的

比较不同超声胎儿体重估计公式在预测胎膜早破早产胎儿出生体重方面的效果。

方法

基于超声测量结果,根据已发表的公式计算估计胎儿体重(EFW)。比较采用估计出生体重(EBW)和观察出生体重(OBW)来计算平均绝对百分比误差[(EBW - OBW)/ OBW×100]、平均百分比误差[(EBW - OBW)/ OBW×100]及其95%置信区间。

结果

研究期间共有234例胎膜早破患者。胎膜早破发生时的平均孕周为31.2±3.7周,分娩时的平均孕周为32.4±3.2周。平均出生体重为1892±610 g。33个公式的中位绝对百分比误差为11.7%。当中位绝对百分比误差的截断值分别为10%和15%时,分别有87.9%和21.2%的公式得出不准确的结果。Vintzileos公式是所有年龄和体重组中唯一绝对百分比误差小于或等于10%的方法。

结论

对于胎膜早破患者,大多数用于超声估计胎儿体重的公式表现尚可。Vintzileos方法是所有孕周和体重组中唯一绝对百分比误差小于10%的公式;因此,它可能是该队列中的首选方法。分娩前羊水指数(AFI)在平均百分比误差方面对公式的性能没有影响。

相似文献

1
Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasonography after preterm premature rupture of membranes: comparison of different formulas.胎膜早破后超声评估胎儿体重:不同公式的比较
J Perinat Med. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):253-266. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0258.
2
Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.比较经阴道超声预测未足月胎膜早破孕妇胎儿体重的公式。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03631-w.
3
Predicting the fetal weight by ultrasonography for isolated polyhydramnios: Comparison of 14 formulas.超声预测单纯性羊水过多胎儿体重:14 种公式比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Sep;50(9):1522-1530. doi: 10.1111/jog.16025. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
The accuracy of ultrasound-estimated fetal weight in extremely preterm infants: a comparison of small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age.超声估计极早早产儿体重的准确性:小于胎龄儿与适于胎龄儿的比较
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;54(2):126-31. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12198. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
5
Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas.寻找预测胎儿体重的最佳公式:18种公式的比较
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;80(2):78-84. doi: 10.1159/000365814. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
6
Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.超声估计大于胎龄胎儿体重:17种超声公式与4种模型算法的比较
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Jul;23(7):675-80. doi: 10.3109/14767050903410631.
7
Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.中国人中低出生体重儿和巨大儿的体重估计。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;284(3):599-606. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1730-8. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
8
Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula.估算腹壁缺陷胎儿的胎儿体重:两种近期超声公式与 Hadlock 公式的比较。
J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Jul;29(7):1069-74. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.7.1069.
9
Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor.840例引产术前患有不同妊娠并发症的女性中超声估计胎儿体重的准确性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;23(2):172-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.940.
10
Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?超声胎儿体重估计:是否应使用针对巨大儿的公式?
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Aug;32(10):968-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545664. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of the sonographic determination of estimated fetal weight in anhydramnios.超声检测无水症中胎儿估计体重的准确性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;308(4):1151-1158. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06762-3. Epub 2022 Sep 10.