Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, and Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neuropharmacology. 2017 Apr;116:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
Quantitative analysis of antagonism is infrequently used to identify nAChRs mediating behavioral effects. Here, nicotine (0.032 mg/kg i.v.) was established as a discriminative stimulus in rhesus monkeys responding under a fixed ratio 5 schedule; pharmacokinetics and underlying nAChR mechanism(s) were examined. When measured up to 4 h in venous blood, the training dose resulted in the following mean pharmacokinetic parameters: nicotine C = 71.7 ng/ml, t = 116 min, and clearance = 6.25 ml/min/kg; cotinine C = 191 ng/ml; and 3OH-cotinine C = 63 ng/ml. The ED value of nicotine to produce discriminative stimulus effects was 0.013 mg/kg. Epibatidine and varenicline increased drug-lever responding to 97% and 95%, respectively (ED values = 0.00015 and 0.031 mg/kg, respectively), whereas cocaine, midazolam, and morphine produced no more than 28% drug-appropriate responding. Mecamylamine and dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE) dose-dependently attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of the nicotine training dose, whereas methyllycaconitine (MLA) did not. DHβE (0.1 and 0.32) produced rightward shifts of the nicotine and varenicline dose-response functions; Schild plots fitted through individual data resulted in slopes that were not different from unity; the apparent pA calculated for DHβE did not significantly differ in the presence of nicotine (6.58) or varenicline (6.45). Compared to human cigarette smoking, nicotine blood levels after 0.032 mg/kg nicotine i.v. took a similar time to reach maximal concentration, levels at Cmax were similar to smoking 2-3 cigarettes, while average nicotine levels were comparable to smoking 5-6 cigarettes. Apparent pA analysis with DHβE under these conditions is consistent with nicotine and varenicline acting through the same nAChRs to produce discriminative stimulus effects.
拮抗作用的定量分析很少用于识别介导行为效应的 nAChR。在这里,尼古丁(0.032mg/kg 静脉注射)被确立为恒比 5 程序下猕猴反应的辨别刺激物;研究了药代动力学和潜在的 nAChR 机制。当在静脉血中测量长达 4 小时时,训练剂量产生以下平均药代动力学参数:尼古丁 C=71.7ng/ml,t=116min,清除率=6.25ml/min/kg;可替宁 C=191ng/ml;和 3OH-可替宁 C=63ng/ml。产生辨别刺激效应的尼古丁 ED 值为 0.013mg/kg。依匹巴林和伐伦克林分别使药物反应增加到 97%和 95%(ED 值分别为 0.00015 和 0.031mg/kg),而可卡因、咪达唑仑和吗啡的药物反应不超过 28%。美加仑胺和二氢-β-erythroidine(DHβE)剂量依赖性地减弱了尼古丁训练剂量的辨别刺激效应,而甲基lycaconitine(MLA)则没有。DHβE(0.1 和 0.32)使尼古丁和伐伦克林剂量反应函数向右移位;通过个体数据拟合的 Schild 图得出的斜率与单位斜率没有差异;在存在尼古丁(6.58)或伐伦克林(6.45)时,计算出的 DHβE 的表观 pA 没有显著差异。与人类吸烟相比,静脉注射 0.032mg/kg 尼古丁后,尼古丁血药水平达到最大浓度的时间相似,Cmax 水平与吸烟 2-3 支香烟相似,而平均尼古丁水平与吸烟 5-6 支香烟相当。在这些条件下,用 DHβE 进行的表观 pA 分析与尼古丁和伐伦克林通过相同的 nAChR 产生辨别刺激效应一致。