Suppr超能文献

采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗的梅森III型桡骨头骨折:这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?

Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?

作者信息

Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Rocchi M, Capra F, Catani F

机构信息

Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124 Modena, Italy.

Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124 Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial head fractures make up approximately 3% of all fractures and they are the most common elbow fracture in adults. Replacement through arthroplasty is the recommended treatment in the context of unstable elbow injury and comminuted radial head fracture. The midterm clinical, functional, and radiographic results in patients treated with anatomic radial head arthroplasty for a Mason type III radial head fracture are presented.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective search of our facility's prospective trauma database to identify all skeletally mature patients who were treated by primary radial head replacement or open reduction and internal fixation following an acute radial head fracture. Inclusion criteria were Mason type III fractures and anatomic radial head arthroplasty (RHA). All the patients included were evaluated using a standard postoperative protocol including clinical and radiographic evaluation at 1, 3 and 12 months of follow-up. All the patients were reviewed clinically at an average of 30 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-one subjects (32 Mason type III and 9 Mason IV fractures) were treated with anatomic RHA (Acumed, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Of these, two patients (1 Mason type III and 1 Mason type IV) were excluded from the analysis because severe cognitive impairment. Moreover, we decided to exclude the subjects with a Mason type IV fracture to obtain a more homogeneous sample. Therefore, 31 patients with a Mason type III fracture were included in this study. Based on the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, excellent results were obtained in 24 (77%) patients, good in 3 (10%) and fair in 4 (13%) patients. Heterotopic ossification was reported in 8 patients (26% of cases). The final elbow flexion-extension range of motion was of 112°, with a mean flexion of 125°. The final forearm rotational range of motion was 134° with a mean pronation of 68° and a mean supination of 66°.

DISCUSSION

Anatomic radial head replacement leads to a good functional recovery, even in the presence of severe instability, such as coronoid fractures and LUCL injury. However, patients should be informed of the high number of adverse events (mainly heterotopic ossification) following this treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

摘要

背景

桡骨头骨折约占所有骨折的3%,是成人中最常见的肘部骨折。在肘关节损伤不稳定和桡骨头粉碎性骨折的情况下,建议采用关节置换术进行治疗。本文介绍了采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗Mason III型桡骨头骨折患者的中期临床、功能和影像学结果。

材料与方法

我们对本机构的前瞻性创伤数据库进行了回顾性检索,以确定所有在急性桡骨头骨折后接受初次桡骨头置换或切开复位内固定治疗的骨骼成熟患者。纳入标准为Mason III型骨折和解剖型桡骨头置换术(RHA)。所有纳入患者均按照标准术后方案进行评估,包括在术后1、3和12个月进行临床和影像学评估。所有患者平均在30个月的随访时进行临床复查。

结果

41例患者(32例Mason III型骨折和9例Mason IV型骨折)接受了解剖型RHA(美国俄勒冈州希尔斯伯勒市的Acumed公司产品)治疗。其中,2例患者(1例Mason III型和1例Mason IV型)因严重认知障碍被排除在分析之外。此外,为了获得更同质的样本,我们决定排除Mason IV型骨折的患者。因此,本研究纳入了31例Mason III型骨折患者。根据梅奥肘关节功能评分,24例(77%)患者结果为优,3例(10%)为良,4例(13%)为中。8例患者(占病例的26%)报告有异位骨化。最终肘关节屈伸活动范围为112°,平均屈曲125°。最终前臂旋转活动范围为134°,平均旋前68°,平均旋后66°。

讨论

解剖型桡骨头置换术即使在存在严重不稳定(如冠状突骨折和外侧副韧带损伤)的情况下也能带来良好的功能恢复。然而,应告知患者该治疗后不良事件(主要是异位骨化)的发生率较高。

证据水平

治疗性IV级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验