Kollitz Erin M, Zhang Guozhu, Hawkins Mary Beth, Whitfield G Kerr, Reif David M, Kullman Seth W
Toxicology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 12;11(12):e0168278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168278. eCollection 2016.
The evolution, molecular behavior, and physiological function of nuclear receptors are of particular interest given their diverse roles in regulating essential biological processes. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is well known for its canonical roles in calcium homeostasis and skeletal maintenance. Additionally, VDR has received an increased amount of attention due to the discovery of numerous non-calcemic functions, including the detoxification of lithocholic acid. Lithocholic acid is a toxic metabolite of chenodeoxycholic acid, a primary bile acid. The partnership between the VDR and lithocholic acid has been hypothesized to be a recent adaptation that evolved to mediate the detoxification and elimination of lithocholic acid from the gut. This partnership is speculated to be limited to higher vertebrates (birds and mammals), as lower vertebrates do not synthesize the parent compound of lithocholic acid. However, the molecular functions associated with the observed insensitivity of basal VDRs to lithocholic acid have not been explored. Here we characterize canonical nuclear receptor functions of VDRs from select species representing key nodes in vertebrate evolution and span a range of bile salt phenotypes. Competitive ligand binding assays revealed that the receptor's affinity for lithocholic acid is highly conserved across species, suggesting that lithocholic acid affinity is an ancient and non-adaptive trait. However, transient transactivation assays revealed that lithocholic acid-mediated VDR activation might have evolved more recently, as the non-mammalian receptors did not respond to lithocholic acid unless exogenous coactivator proteins were co-expressed. Subsequent functional assays indicated that differential lithocholic acid-mediated receptor activation is potentially driven by differential protein-protein interactions between VDR and nuclear receptor coregulator proteins. We hypothesize that the vitamin D receptor-lithocholic acid partnership evolved as a by-product of natural selection on the ligand-receptor partnership between the vitamin D receptor and the native VDR ligand: 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, the biologically active metabolite of vitamin D3.
鉴于核受体在调节基本生物学过程中发挥着多种作用,其进化、分子行为和生理功能备受关注。维生素D受体(VDR)在钙稳态和骨骼维持方面的经典作用广为人知。此外,由于发现了许多非钙调节功能,包括石胆酸的解毒作用,VDR受到了越来越多的关注。石胆酸是初级胆汁酸鹅去氧胆酸的有毒代谢产物。VDR与石胆酸之间的合作关系被认为是一种近期的适应性变化,其进化目的是介导石胆酸从肠道的解毒和清除。据推测,这种合作关系仅限于高等脊椎动物(鸟类和哺乳动物),因为低等脊椎动物不合成石胆酸的母体化合物。然而,与观察到的基础VDR对石胆酸不敏感相关的分子功能尚未得到探索。在这里,我们对来自代表脊椎动物进化关键节点且具有一系列胆汁盐表型的选定物种的VDR的经典核受体功能进行了表征。竞争性配体结合试验表明,受体对石胆酸的亲和力在物种间高度保守,这表明石胆酸亲和力是一种古老且非适应性的特征。然而,瞬时转激活试验表明,石胆酸介导的VDR激活可能是最近才进化出来的,因为非哺乳动物受体除非共表达外源性共激活蛋白,否则对石胆酸无反应。随后的功能试验表明,石胆酸介导的受体激活差异可能是由VDR与核受体共调节蛋白之间不同的蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用驱动的。我们假设,维生素D受体-石胆酸合作关系是维生素D受体与天然VDR配体1α,25-二羟基维生素D3(维生素D3的生物活性代谢产物)之间配体-受体合作关系自然选择的副产品。