Price J M, Dodge K A
San Diego State University, California 92182.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1989 Aug;17(4):455-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00915038.
Although there has been an accumulation of evidence to suggest a link between peer-directed aggression and social rejection, little attention has been given to the relations between specific subtypes of aggressive behavior and social rejection. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the relations between two subtypes of aggressive behavior (reactive and proactive aggression) and children's classroom peer status. The reciprocity of each of these subtypes of aggressive behavior and the social contexts in which these behaviors occur were also examined. Assessments of each of these forms of aggression among 70 boys (ages 5 and 6) were conducted using direct observations and teacher ratings. In general, directing reactive aggressive behavior toward peers was associated with social rejection, while utilization of instrumental aggression was positively related to peer status. The findings also indicated that directing proactive forms of aggression toward peers was related to being the target of proactive aggression. Finally, among older boys, both subtypes of aggression were more likely to occur during rough play than during any other type of play activity.
尽管已有大量证据表明同伴导向的攻击行为与社会排斥之间存在联系,但对于攻击行为的特定子类型与社会排斥之间的关系却很少有人关注。本调查的目的是检验两种攻击行为子类型(反应性攻击和主动性攻击)与儿童在课堂上的同伴地位之间的关系。同时还考察了这些攻击行为子类型各自的相互作用以及这些行为发生的社会背景。通过直接观察和教师评分,对70名5岁和6岁男孩的每种攻击形式进行了评估。总体而言,对同伴表现出反应性攻击行为与社会排斥相关,而工具性攻击的运用与同伴地位呈正相关。研究结果还表明,对同伴表现出主动性攻击形式与成为主动性攻击的目标有关。最后,在年龄较大的男孩中,两种攻击行为子类型在打闹游戏中比在任何其他类型的游戏活动中更有可能发生。