• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两栖动物生态风险评估方法综述:测试方法与可用数据的比较评估

A review of ecological risk assessment methods for amphibians: Comparative assessment of testing methodologies and available data.

作者信息

Johnson Mark S, Aubee Catherine, Salice Christopher J, Leigh Katrina B, Liu Elissa, Pott Ute, Pillard David

机构信息

US Army Public Health Center, Toxicology Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):601-613. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1881. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1002/ieam.1881
PMID:27943571
Abstract

Historically, ecological risk assessments have rarely included amphibian species, focusing preferentially on other aquatic (fish, invertebrates, algae) and terrestrial wildlife (birds and mammal) species. Often this lack of consideration is due to a paucity of toxicity data, significant variation in study design, uncertainty with regard to exposure, or a combination of all three. Productive risk assessments for amphibians are particularly challenging, given variations in complex life history strategies. Further consideration is needed for the development of useful laboratory animal models and appropriate experimental test procedures that can be effectively applied to the examination of biological response patterns. Using these standardized techniques, risk estimates can be more accurately defined to ensure adequate protection of amphibians from a variety of stress agents. Patterns in toxicity may help to ascertain whether test results from 1 amphibian group (e.g., Urodela) could be sufficiently protective of another (e.g., Anura) and/or whether some nonamphibian aquatic taxonomic groups (e.g., fish or aquatic invertebrates) may be representative of aquatic amphibian life stages. This scope is intended to be a guide in the development of methods that would yield data appropriate for ecological risk decisions applicable to amphibians. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:601-613. © 2016 SETAC.

摘要

从历史上看,生态风险评估很少将两栖动物物种纳入其中,而是优先关注其他水生(鱼类、无脊椎动物、藻类)和陆生野生动物(鸟类和哺乳动物)物种。这种缺乏考虑的情况通常是由于毒性数据匮乏、研究设计存在显著差异、暴露方面的不确定性或这三者的综合原因。鉴于复杂的生活史策略存在差异,对两栖动物进行有效的风险评估尤其具有挑战性。开发有用的实验动物模型和可有效应用于生物反应模式检测的适当实验测试程序需要进一步考虑。使用这些标准化技术,可以更准确地定义风险估计值,以确保充分保护两栖动物免受各种应激源的影响。毒性模式可能有助于确定来自一个两栖动物群体(如蝾螈目)的测试结果是否能充分保护另一个群体(如无尾目),和/或某些非两栖类水生分类群(如鱼类或水生无脊椎动物)是否可代表两栖动物的水生生活阶段。本范围旨在为开发能产生适用于两栖动物生态风险决策的数据的方法提供指导。《综合环境评估与管理》2017年;13:601 - 613。© 2016 SETAC。

相似文献

1
A review of ecological risk assessment methods for amphibians: Comparative assessment of testing methodologies and available data.两栖动物生态风险评估方法综述:测试方法与可用数据的比较评估
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):601-613. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1881. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
Acute oral toxicity of chemicals in terrestrial life stages of amphibians: Comparisons to birds and mammals.化学物质对两栖动物陆地生活阶段的急性经口毒性:与鸟类和哺乳动物的比较。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;80:335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
Risk assessment considerations for plant protection products and terrestrial life-stages of amphibians.植物保护产品和两栖类陆生生活阶段的风险评估考虑因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 15;636:500-511. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.189. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
4
Amphibians at risk? Susceptibility of terrestrial amphibian life stages to pesticides.两栖动物面临风险?陆生两栖动物生活史对农药的敏感性。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Nov;30(11):2465-72. doi: 10.1002/etc.650. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
5
Validity of fish, birds and mammals as surrogates for amphibians and reptiles in pesticide toxicity assessment.鱼类、鸟类和哺乳动物作为两栖动物和爬行动物在农药毒性评估中的替代物的有效性。
Ecotoxicology. 2018 Sep;27(7):819-833. doi: 10.1007/s10646-018-1911-y. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
Evaluating the role of fish as surrogates for amphibians in pesticide ecological risk assessment.评估鱼类作为两栖动物在农药生态风险评估中的替代物的作用。
Chemosphere. 2019 Nov;235:952-958. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.166. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
An interspecies correlation model to predict acute dermal toxicity of plant protection products to terrestrial life stages of amphibians using fish acute toxicity and bioconcentration data.利用鱼类急性毒性和生物浓缩数据建立用于预测植物保护产品对两栖类陆生生活阶段急性皮肤毒性的种间相关模型。
Chemosphere. 2017 Dec;189:619-626. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.047. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
8
Ecological risk assessment and testing for endocrine disruption in the aquatic environment.水生环境中内分泌干扰的生态风险评估与测试
Toxicology. 2002 Dec 27;181-182:383-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00471-7.
9
Long-term, landscape-level assessment of aquatic pesticide exposure to identify amphibian ontological traits affecting vulnerability.长期的、景观水平的水生农药暴露评估,以确定影响脆弱性的两栖动物个体特征。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Sep;20(5):1667-1676. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4924. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
10
Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.推导农药水生生物标准的方法。
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009;199:19-109.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term, landscape-level assessment of aquatic pesticide exposure to identify amphibian ontological traits affecting vulnerability.长期的、景观水平的水生农药暴露评估,以确定影响脆弱性的两栖动物个体特征。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Sep;20(5):1667-1676. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4924. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
2
Integrated prediction of water pollution and risk assessment of water system connectivity based on dynamic model average and model selection criteria.基于动态模型平均和模型选择准则的水污染综合预测及水系连通性风险评估
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0287209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287209. eCollection 2023.
3
Estimating dermal contact soil exposure for amphibians.
估算两栖动物的皮肤接触土壤暴露量。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2023 Jan;19(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4619. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Induced Hepatic Glutathione and Metabolomic Alterations Following Mixed Pesticide and Fertilizer Exposures in Juvenile Leopard Frogs (Lithobates sphenocephala).混合农药和肥料暴露后对幼年豹蛙(Lithobates sphenocephala)肝脏谷胱甘肽和代谢组学的诱导改变。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Jan;41(1):122-133. doi: 10.1002/etc.5245.
5
Trematodes coupled with neonicotinoids: effects on blood cell profiles of a model amphibian.吸虫与新烟碱类杀虫剂联合作用:对一种模式两栖动物血细胞谱的影响。
Parasitol Res. 2021 Jun;120(6):2135-2148. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07176-x. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles.关于两栖动物和爬行动物农药风险评估的科学现状的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2018 Feb 23;16(2):e05125. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5125. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
Cross-Taxa Distinctions in Mechanisms of Developmental Effects for Aquatic Species Exposed to Trifluralin.水生物种暴露于氟乐灵的发育效应的跨分类群机制的区别。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Sep;39(9):1797-1812. doi: 10.1002/etc.4758. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Critical Review of Read-Across Potential in Testing for Endocrine-Related Effects in Vertebrate Ecological Receptors.脊椎动物生态受体内分泌相关效应测试中读交叉潜力的批判性评价
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Apr;39(4):739-753. doi: 10.1002/etc.4682. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
9
Guidance for Developing Amphibian Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment.制定用于生态风险评估的两栖动物种群模型指南。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020 Mar;16(2):223-233. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4215. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
10
Assessment of Sublethal Effects of Neonicotinoid Insecticides on the Life-History Traits of 2 Frog Species.评估新烟碱类杀虫剂对 2 种蛙类生活史特征的亚致死效应。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Sep;38(9):1967-1977. doi: 10.1002/etc.4511. Epub 2019 Aug 6.