Suppr超能文献

两栖动物生态风险评估方法综述:测试方法与可用数据的比较评估

A review of ecological risk assessment methods for amphibians: Comparative assessment of testing methodologies and available data.

作者信息

Johnson Mark S, Aubee Catherine, Salice Christopher J, Leigh Katrina B, Liu Elissa, Pott Ute, Pillard David

机构信息

US Army Public Health Center, Toxicology Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):601-613. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1881. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

Abstract

Historically, ecological risk assessments have rarely included amphibian species, focusing preferentially on other aquatic (fish, invertebrates, algae) and terrestrial wildlife (birds and mammal) species. Often this lack of consideration is due to a paucity of toxicity data, significant variation in study design, uncertainty with regard to exposure, or a combination of all three. Productive risk assessments for amphibians are particularly challenging, given variations in complex life history strategies. Further consideration is needed for the development of useful laboratory animal models and appropriate experimental test procedures that can be effectively applied to the examination of biological response patterns. Using these standardized techniques, risk estimates can be more accurately defined to ensure adequate protection of amphibians from a variety of stress agents. Patterns in toxicity may help to ascertain whether test results from 1 amphibian group (e.g., Urodela) could be sufficiently protective of another (e.g., Anura) and/or whether some nonamphibian aquatic taxonomic groups (e.g., fish or aquatic invertebrates) may be representative of aquatic amphibian life stages. This scope is intended to be a guide in the development of methods that would yield data appropriate for ecological risk decisions applicable to amphibians. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:601-613. © 2016 SETAC.

摘要

从历史上看,生态风险评估很少将两栖动物物种纳入其中,而是优先关注其他水生(鱼类、无脊椎动物、藻类)和陆生野生动物(鸟类和哺乳动物)物种。这种缺乏考虑的情况通常是由于毒性数据匮乏、研究设计存在显著差异、暴露方面的不确定性或这三者的综合原因。鉴于复杂的生活史策略存在差异,对两栖动物进行有效的风险评估尤其具有挑战性。开发有用的实验动物模型和可有效应用于生物反应模式检测的适当实验测试程序需要进一步考虑。使用这些标准化技术,可以更准确地定义风险估计值,以确保充分保护两栖动物免受各种应激源的影响。毒性模式可能有助于确定来自一个两栖动物群体(如蝾螈目)的测试结果是否能充分保护另一个群体(如无尾目),和/或某些非两栖类水生分类群(如鱼类或水生无脊椎动物)是否可代表两栖动物的水生生活阶段。本范围旨在为开发能产生适用于两栖动物生态风险决策的数据的方法提供指导。《综合环境评估与管理》2017年;13:601 - 613。© 2016 SETAC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验