Concluding comments on the special series on the place of IQ in defining learning disabilities.
作者信息
Wong B Y
出版信息
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):519-20. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200815.
PMID:2794774
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Concluding comments on the special series on the place of IQ in defining learning disabilities.关于智商在定义学习障碍中作用的特别系列的总结评论。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):519-20. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200815.
2
Why IQ is relevant to the definition of learning disabilities.为何智商与学习障碍的定义相关。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):484-6. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200806.
3
IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities: a position in search of logic and data.智商与学习障碍的定义无关：一种缺乏逻辑和数据支撑的观点。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):504-6, 512. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200811.
4
Has the learning disabilities field lost its intelligence?学习障碍领域是否已失去其智慧？
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):487-92. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200807.
5
IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities.智商与学习障碍的定义无关。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):469-78, 486. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200803.
6
The irrelevance of IQ to the definition of learning disabilities: some empirical evidence.智商与学习障碍定义的不相关性：一些实证证据。
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Aug-Sep;24(7):434-8. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400709.
7
Phonological processes and other routes.
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):493-7. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200808.
8
Why we do not need intelligence test scores in the definition and analyses of learning disabilities.
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):514-8. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200814.
9
Let's not confuse test scores with the substance of the discrepancy model.我们不要将测试分数与差异模型的实质内容相混淆。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):482-3. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200805.
10
Is IQ necessary in the definition of learning disabilities? Introduction to the special series.
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Oct;22(8):468. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200802.
Zotero 插件