Styf J
Department of Orthopaedics, East Hospital, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
J Orthop Res. 1989;7(6):812-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100070606.
Recording of intramuscular pressure by using the injection technique in different ways has been evaluated in 12 healthy subjects and 12 patients with medial tibial syndrome. Pressure recording with an injection needle was compared to the recording by a Teflon catheter with multiple side holes at its tip. Following an injection of 0.07 ml, the intramuscular pressure was significantly higher when it was recorded with the injection needle. Pressure recorded with an injection needle by the "meniscus method" was found to be significantly closer to the preinjection pressure compared to the injection technique described by Whitesides et al. Pressure readings by the "meniscus method" after injection, and by a catheter or needle with multiple side holes, decrease the drawbacks of the injection technique.
已在12名健康受试者和12名患有胫骨内侧综合征的患者中评估了以不同方式使用注射技术记录肌内压力的情况。将使用注射针记录的压力与使用尖端有多个侧孔的聚四氟乙烯导管记录的压力进行了比较。注射0.07毫升后,使用注射针记录时肌内压力明显更高。与Whitesides等人描述的注射技术相比,发现通过“半月板法”用注射针记录的压力明显更接近注射前压力。注射后通过“半月板法”以及使用有多个侧孔的导管或针进行的压力读数减少了注射技术的缺点。