Kwon Sun U, Kim Jong S
Front Neurol Neurosci. 2016;40:141-151. doi: 10.1159/000448310. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
Symptomatic cerebral atherosclerosis including intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke. Antithrombotic agents are the mainstay of therapy in these patients. Several studies have found anticoagulation (warfarin) to increase the risk of bleeding events and have an efficacy no better than that of aspirin. Therefore, anticoagulants are not widely used unless patients develop recurrent ischemic symptoms despite receiving antiplatelet therapy. Because ICAS progression is not uncommon and the risk of stroke recurrence is high when aspirin monotherapy is used, dual antiplatelet agents may be needed at least in the early disease stage. The Trial of Cilostazol in Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis (TOSS) found that aspirin plus cilostazol was significantly better than aspirin monotherapy in preventing progression (6.7 vs. 28.8%, p = 0.008). The TOSS II trial that compared aspirin plus cilostazol with aspirin plus clopidogrel found no significant difference in the progression rate (9.3% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.092). However, the overall changes in stenosis were more favorable (i.e., less progression and more regression) in the cilostazol group (p = 0.049). TOSS studies have limitations in that the end points were changes in magnetic resonance angiography results rather than clinical outcomes. Based on the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial results, and the fair outcome found in patients enrolled in the SAMMPRIS (Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis) trial, aspirin plus clopidogrel has been recommended in the early stage of symptomatic ICAS. However, the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel did not show superiority over aspirin monotherapy in ICAS patients in a recent CHANCE substudy. Considering that ICAS is the major pathology leading to stroke worldwide, further studies are needed to identify the best medication strategy in ICAS patients. Until then, physicians may choose appropriate antiplatelet agents after careful consideration of the characteristics of both the patients (i.e., degree of stenosis, stroke mechanism, risk of stroke, and risk of bleeding) and the antiplatelet agent (e.g., side effect, cost).
有症状的脑动脉粥样硬化,包括颅内动脉粥样硬化(ICAS),与复发性中风的高风险相关。抗血栓药物是这些患者治疗的主要手段。多项研究发现,抗凝治疗(华法林)会增加出血事件的风险,且疗效并不优于阿司匹林。因此,除非患者在接受抗血小板治疗后仍出现复发性缺血症状,否则抗凝剂并不广泛使用。由于ICAS进展并不罕见,且使用阿司匹林单药治疗时中风复发风险较高,因此至少在疾病早期可能需要双联抗血小板药物。西洛他唑治疗有症状颅内狭窄试验(TOSS)发现,阿司匹林联合西洛他唑在预防进展方面显著优于阿司匹林单药治疗(6.7%对28.8%,p = 0.008)。比较阿司匹林联合西洛他唑与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷的TOSS II试验发现,进展率无显著差异(9.3%对15.5%,p = 0.092)。然而,西洛他唑组狭窄的总体变化更有利(即进展更少、逆转更多)(p = 0.049)。TOSS研究存在局限性,其终点是磁共振血管造影结果的变化而非临床结局。基于氯吡格雷用于急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者(CHANCE)试验结果,以及颅内动脉狭窄支架置入与强化药物治疗对比研究(SAMMPRIS)试验中入组患者的良好结局,阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷被推荐用于有症状ICAS的早期阶段。然而,在最近的一项CHANCE子研究中,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合治疗在ICAS患者中并未显示出优于阿司匹林单药治疗的效果。鉴于ICAS是全球导致中风的主要病理因素,需要进一步研究以确定ICAS患者的最佳用药策略。在此之前,医生在仔细考虑患者特征(即狭窄程度、中风机制、中风风险和出血风险)以及抗血小板药物特性(如副作用、成本)后,可选择合适的抗血小板药物。