Suppr超能文献

开放医嘱患者反馈报告工具:对医患安全和质量伙伴关系的影响。

A patient feedback reporting tool for OpenNotes: implications for patient-clinician safety and quality partnerships.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Health Care Quality, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):312-322. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006020. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

OpenNotes, a national movement inviting patients to read their clinicians' notes online, may enhance safety through patient-reported documentation errors.

OBJECTIVE

To test an OpenNotes patient reporting tool focused on safety concerns.

METHODS

We invited 6225 patients through a patient portal to provide note feedback in a quality improvement pilot between August 2014 and 2015. A link at the end of the note led to a 9-question survey. Patient Relations personnel vetted responses, shared safety concerns with providers and documented whether changes were made.

RESULTS

2736/6225(44%) of patients read notes; among these, 1 in 12 patients used the tool, submitting 260 reports. Nearly all (96%) respondents reported understanding the note. Patients and care partners documented potential safety concerns in 23% of reports; 2% did not understand the care plan and 21% reported possible mistakes, including medications, existing health problems, something important missing from the note or current symptoms. Among these, 64% were definite or possible safety concerns on clinician review, and 57% of cases confirmed with patients resulted in a change to the record or care. The feedback tool exceeded the reporting rate of our ambulatory online clinician adverse event reporting system several-fold. After a year, 99% of patients and care partners found the tool valuable, 97% wanted it to continue, 98% reported unchanged or improved relationships with their clinician, and none of the providers in the small pilot reported worsening workflow or relationships with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and care partners reported potential safety concerns in about one-quarter of reports, often resulting in a change to the record or care. Early data from an OpenNotes patient reporting tool may help engage patients as safety partners without apparent negative consequences for clinician workflow or patient-clinician relationships.

摘要

背景

OpenNotes 是一项全国性运动,邀请患者在线阅读临床医生的记录,通过患者报告的记录错误,可能会提高安全性。

目的

测试专注于安全问题的 OpenNotes 患者报告工具。

方法

我们通过患者门户邀请了 6225 名患者在 2014 年 8 月至 2015 年期间的质量改进试点中提供记录反馈。记录末尾的链接引导至一个包含 9 个问题的调查。患者关系人员审查了答复,与提供者分享安全问题,并记录是否进行了更改。

结果

6225 名患者中有 2736 名(44%)阅读了记录;其中,每 12 名患者中就有 1 名使用了该工具,提交了 260 份报告。几乎所有(96%)的受访者表示理解记录。患者和护理人员在 23%的报告中记录了潜在的安全问题;2%的人不理解护理计划,21%的人报告了可能的错误,包括药物、现有的健康问题、记录中遗漏了重要信息或当前症状。其中,64%的错误经临床医生审查被确认为或可能存在安全问题,在与患者确认后,57%的病例导致记录或护理发生变化。该反馈工具的报告率是我们门诊在线临床医生不良事件报告系统的数倍。一年后,99%的患者和护理人员认为该工具很有价值,97%的人希望继续使用,98%的人报告说与他们的临床医生的关系没有变化或有所改善,小型试点中的没有一位临床医生报告工作流程或与患者的关系恶化。

结论

患者和护理人员在大约四分之一的报告中报告了潜在的安全问题,通常会导致记录或护理的改变。OpenNotes 患者报告工具的早期数据可能有助于让患者作为安全合作伙伴参与进来,而不会对临床医生的工作流程或患者与临床医生的关系产生明显的负面影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验