• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为非正式护理人员提供健康信息:将开放病历作为一种安全策略。

Empowering Informal Caregivers with Health Information: OpenNotes as a Safety Strategy.

作者信息

Chimowitz Hannah, Gerard Macda, Fossa Alan, Bourgeois Fabienne, Bell Sigall K

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;44(3):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.09.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.09.004
PMID:29499809
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enabling family/friend caregivers with access to visit notes may help avoid errors, delayed diagnoses, or other ambulatory safety risks. Patient, parent, and caregiver perceptions of how shared notes affect safety behaviors and attitudes were studied in an exploratory study.

METHODS

To assess the impact of OpenNotes on safety, 24,722 patients with active portal accounts and ≥ 1 available visit notes during the prior year at an urban hospital were surveyed between June and September 2016. Surveys were sent to patient portal accounts, and respondents designated themselves as patients or caregivers. Although the hospital does not have formal proxy portal registration, some patients share access with their caregivers.

RESULTS

Of 24,722 portal accounts accessed during the study, 7,058 (28.5%) surveys were returned, with 150 (2.1%) participants identified as caregivers. Among patients who had tests and referrals, reading notes helped caregivers understand the reason for the test (96/120 [80.0%]) or referral (48/52 [92.3%]), remember to get patient tests done (66/120 [55.0%]), check (98/120 [81.7%]) and understand (98/120 [81.7%]) results, and remember patient appointments (36/52 [69.2%]). As a result of reading notes, 54.1% (59/109) of caregivers helping patients on prescription medications reported better assisting patients to take them correctly. Among note-reading caregivers, 53.7% (n =  72/134) trusted the clinician more (44.8% no change), and 58.2% (n =  78/134) reported better teamwork (41.0% no change) as a result of open notes. In total, 30.3% (n =  40/132) reported at least one mistake or possible mistake in the patient's notes. Finding a possible mistake did not negatively affect trust or teamwork.

CONCLUSION

OpenNotes may enable caregivers with patient health information, answering the call to better support this critical group in the health care system and to engage patients and families in safety efforts.

摘要

背景

让家庭/朋友护理人员能够查看病历可能有助于避免错误、延迟诊断或其他门诊安全风险。在一项探索性研究中,研究了患者、家长和护理人员对共享病历如何影响安全行为和态度的看法。

方法

为评估开放病历对安全性的影响,2016年6月至9月期间,对一家城市医院中24,722名拥有活跃门户账户且上一年至少有一份可用就诊记录的患者进行了调查。调查问卷发送至患者门户账户,受访者将自己指定为患者或护理人员。尽管该医院没有正式的代理门户注册,但一些患者会与他们的护理人员共享访问权限。

结果

在研究期间访问的24,722个门户账户中,有7,058份(28.5%)调查问卷被返回,其中150名(2.1%)参与者被确定为护理人员。在进行了检查和转诊的患者中,阅读病历有助于护理人员理解检查(96/120 [80.0%])或转诊(48/52 [92.3%])的原因,记住让患者完成检查(66/120 [55.0%]),查看(98/120 [81.7%])并理解(98/120 [81.7%])检查结果,以及记住患者的预约(36/52 [69.2%])。由于阅读了病历,在帮助患者服用处方药的护理人员中,54.1%(59/109)报告更好地协助患者正确服药。在阅读病历的护理人员中,53.7%(n = 72/134)对临床医生的信任度更高(44.8%无变化),58.2%(n = 78/134)报告由于开放病历,团队合作更好(41.0%无变化)。总体而言,30.3%(n = 40/132)报告在患者病历中至少发现了一个错误或可能的错误。发现可能的错误并未对信任或团队合作产生负面影响。

结论

开放病历可能使护理人员能够获取患者健康信息,响应了更好地支持医疗保健系统中这一关键群体以及让患者和家庭参与安全工作的呼吁。

相似文献

1
Empowering Informal Caregivers with Health Information: OpenNotes as a Safety Strategy.为非正式护理人员提供健康信息:将开放病历作为一种安全策略。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;44(3):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.09.004.
2
Tackling Ambulatory Safety Risks Through Patient Engagement: What 10,000 Patients and Families Say About Safety-Related Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes After Reading Visit Notes.通过患者参与解决门诊安全风险:10000 名患者及其家属在阅读就诊记录后对安全相关知识、行为和态度的看法。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e791-e799. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000494.
3
The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study.患者门户网站上的就诊记录对教育程度较低或非白人患者参与医疗的重要性:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 24;20(5):e191. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9196.
4
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Patients' Perceptions of the Patient Portal Experience with OpenNotes.患者对开放医嘱患者门户体验的定性和定量分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):10-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676588. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians' Outpatient Visit Notes.7年后的开放病历:患者持续获取临床医生门诊病历记录的体验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 6;21(5):e13876. doi: 10.2196/13876.
6
Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits.与他人分享透明就诊记录的患者:特征、风险与益处。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 12;16(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3363.
7
Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes.电子健康记录门诊护理记录中患者报告错误的频率和类型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5867.
8
When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship.当医生与患者共享就诊记录时:一项关于患者和医生对文档错误、安全机会以及医患关系的看法的研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):262-270. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004697. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Insights Into Older Adult Patient Concerns Around the Caregiver Proxy Portal Use: Qualitative Interview Study.深入了解老年患者对使用照顾者代理门户的担忧:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 2;20(11):e10524. doi: 10.2196/10524.
10
Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey.芬兰患者对基于网络的电子健康记录访问的体验:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 6;24(6):e37438. doi: 10.2196/37438.

引用本文的文献

1
A proof-of-concept study for patient use of open notes with large language models.一项关于患者使用带有大语言模型的开放病历的概念验证研究。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Apr 9;8(2):ooaf021. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf021. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating.患者门户的最新进展:适应外部因素、解决障碍和创新。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):654-669. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770901. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Patient and family contributions to improve the diagnostic process through the OurDX electronic health record tool: a mixed method analysis.
患者和家属通过 OurDX 电子健康记录工具为改善诊断过程做出的贡献:混合方法分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Aug 16;33(9):597-608. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015793.
4
Evaluation of Patient-Friendly Diagnosis Clarifications in a Hospital Patient Portal.医院患者门户中便于患者理解的诊断澄清评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):455-464. doi: 10.1055/a-2067-5310. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
5
A Patient-Centered Approach to Writing Ambulatory Visit Notes in the Cures Act Era.《治愈法案》时代以患者为中心的门诊就诊记录撰写方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):199-204. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761436. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
Patient Portals to Support Care Partner Engagement in Adolescent and Adult Populations: A Scoping Review.患者门户支持青少年和成年人群体中的照护者参与:一项范围综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48696.
7
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.实施多组分干预措施以改善初级保健中与有和无痴呆症的老年患者进行沟通的感知障碍和促进因素(SHARING Choices):一项定性研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221137251. doi: 10.1177/21501319221137251.
8
Perceptions of Quality of Care Among Users of a Web-Based Patient Portal: Cross-sectional Survey Analysis.基于网络的患者门户用户对医疗质量的认知:横断面调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 17;24(11):e39973. doi: 10.2196/39973.
9
Tablet distribution to veterans: an opportunity to increase patient portal adoption and use.向退伍军人分发平板电脑:提高患者门户采用率和使用率的机会。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):73-82. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac195.
10
Lessons Learned from OpenNotes Learning Mode and Subsequent Implementation across a Pediatric Health System.从开放医嘱学习模式及后续在儿科医疗体系中的实施中得到的经验教训。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):113-122. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741483. Epub 2022 Jan 26.