Zora Hatice, Riad Tomas, Schwarz Iris-Corinna, Heldner Mattias
Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Swedish Language and Multilingualism, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Neurosci. 2016 Nov 29;10:533. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00533. eCollection 2016.
Like that of many other Germanic languages, the stress system of Swedish has mainly undergone phonological analysis. Recently, however, researchers have begun to recognize the central role of morphology in these systems. Similar to the lexical specification of tonal accent, the Swedish stress system is claimed to be morphologically determined and morphemes are thus categorized as prosodically specified and prosodically unspecified. Prosodically specified morphemes bear stress information as part of their lexical representations and are classified as tonic (i.e., lexically stressed), pretonic and posttonic, whereas prosodically unspecified morphemes receive stress through a phonological rule that is right-edge oriented, but is sensitive to prosodic specification at that edge. The presence of prosodic specification is inferred from vowel quality and vowel quantity; if stress moves elsewhere, vowel quality and quantity change radically in phonologically stressed morphemes, whereas traces of stress remain in lexically stressed morphemes. The present study is the first to investigate whether stress is a lexical property of Swedish morphemes by comparing mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to vowel quality and quantity changes in phonologically stressed and lexically stressed words. In a passive oddball paradigm, 15 native speakers of Swedish were presented with standards and deviants, which differed from the standards in formant frequency and duration. Given that vowel quality and quantity changes are associated with morphological derivations only in phonologically stressed words, MMN responses are expected to be greater in phonologically stressed words than in lexically stressed words that lack such an association. The results indicated that the processing differences between phonologically and lexically stressed words were reflected in the amplitude and topography of MMN responses. Confirming the expectation, MMN amplitude was greater for the phonologically stressed word than for the lexically stressed word and showed a more widespread topographic distribution. The brain did not only detect vowel quality and quantity changes but also used them to activate memory traces associated with derivations. The present study therefore implies that morphology is directly involved in the Swedish stress system and that changes in phonological shape due to stress shift cue upcoming stress and potential addition of a morpheme.
与许多其他日耳曼语一样,瑞典语的重音系统主要经过了音系学分析。然而,最近研究人员开始认识到形态学在这些系统中的核心作用。与声调重音的词汇规定类似,瑞典语重音系统据称由形态学决定,因此语素被分类为韵律指定和非韵律指定。韵律指定语素将重音信息作为其词汇表征的一部分,并被分类为有重音的(即词汇重音)、重音前和重音后的,而非韵律指定语素则通过一条以词尾为导向但对该词尾的韵律指定敏感的音系规则来接收重音。韵律指定的存在是从元音质量和元音数量推断出来的;如果重音转移到其他地方,在音系重音语素中元音质量和数量会发生根本性变化,而在词汇重音语素中重音痕迹仍然存在。本研究首次通过比较失配负波(MMN)对音系重音词和词汇重音词中元音质量和数量变化的反应,来探究重音是否是瑞典语语素的一种词汇属性。在一个被动式奇偶数范式中,向15名以瑞典语为母语的人呈现标准刺激和偏离刺激,它们在共振峰频率和时长上与标准刺激不同。鉴于元音质量和数量变化仅在音系重音词中与形态派生相关联,预计MMN对音系重音词的反应会比重音与这种关联无关的词汇重音词更大。结果表明,音系重音词和词汇重音词之间的加工差异反映在MMN反应的幅度和地形图上。正如预期的那样,音系重音词的MMN幅度比重音词的更大,并且显示出更广泛的地形图分布。大脑不仅检测到了元音质量和数量的变化,还利用它们激活了与派生相关的记忆痕迹。因此,本研究意味着形态学直接参与了瑞典语重音系统,并且由于重音转移导致的音系形式变化暗示了即将出现的重音和可能添加的一个语素。