Berkel J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1989 Oct 14;133(41):2027-30.
In 1985 the regional cancer registry in the IKMN area started. Pathology reports are used as the primary source of information for the registry. In order to evaluate the completeness of the registry, the registry database was compared with the discharge diagnosis register of the participating hospitals (LMR). In 1986 a total of 3546 tumours were registered by the registry, using the pathology reports as the primary source. The comparison with the LMR revealed that 616 patients were included in the cancer registry but not in the LMR. On the other hand 376 patients, in 180 of whom the diagnosis was confirmed by pathological examination while in 196 the diagnosis was based on clinical grounds only, were missing in the registry. Specifically, tumours of the central nervous system, liver, gallbladder, bile ducts and pancreas were missed in a high percentage. It is concluded that--even with an optimal pathology notification system--the LMR check is necessary to avoid underregistration. Omitting this check results in a 5% underregistration.
1985年,IKMN地区的区域癌症登记处开始运作。病理报告被用作该登记处的主要信息来源。为了评估登记处的完整性,将登记处数据库与参与医院的出院诊断登记簿(LMR)进行了比较。1986年,该登记处以病理报告为主要来源,共登记了3546例肿瘤。与LMR的比较显示,有616名患者被纳入癌症登记处,但未被纳入LMR。另一方面,登记处遗漏了376名患者,其中180名患者的诊断经病理检查证实,196名患者的诊断仅基于临床依据。具体而言,中枢神经系统、肝脏、胆囊、胆管和胰腺的肿瘤遗漏比例较高。得出的结论是——即使有最佳的病理报告系统——进行LMR检查对于避免登记不足也是必要的。省略此项检查会导致5%的登记不足。