VanderKaay Sandra, Moll Sandra E, Gewurtz Rebecca E, Jindal Pranay, Loyola-Sanchez Adalberto, Packham Tara L, Lim Chun Y
a School of Rehabilitation Science , McMaster University , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada.
b Cumming School of Medicine , University of Calgary , Calgary , Alberta , Canada.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Mar;40(6):705-713. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1261414. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
Qualitative research has had a significant impact within rehabilitation science over time. During the past 20 years the number of qualitative studies published per year in Disability and Rehabilitation has markedly increased (from 1 to 54). In addition, during this period there have been significant changes in how qualitative research is conceptualized, conducted, and utilized to advance the field of rehabilitation. The purpose of this article is to reflect upon the progress of qualitative research within rehabilitation to date, to explicate current opportunities and challenges, and to suggest future directions to continue to strengthen the contribution of qualitative research in this field.
Relevant literature searches were conducted in electronic data bases and reference lists. Pertinent literature was examined to identify current opportunities and challenges for qualitative research use in rehabilitation and to identify future directions.
Six key areas of opportunity and challenge were identified: (a) paradigm shifts, (b) advancements in methodology, (c) emerging technology, (d) advances in quality evaluation, (e) increasing popularity of mixed methods approaches, and (f) evolving approaches to knowledge translation. Two important future directions for rehabilitation are posited: (1) advanced training in qualitative methods and (2) engaging qualitative communities of research.
Qualitative research is well established in rehabilitation and has an important place in the continued growth of this field. Ongoing development of qualitative researchers and methods are essential. Implications for Rehabilitation Qualitative research has the potential to improve rehabilitation practice by addressing some of the most pervasive concerns in the field such as practitioner-client interaction, the subjective and lived experience of disability, and clinical reasoning and decision making. This will serve to better inform those providing rehabilitation services thereby benefiting patients that are utilizing these services. Changes over time in how qualitative research is conceptualized, conducted, and utilized to advance rehabilitation science have resulted in a number of unique opportunities and challenges in using qualitative research that must be considered within this field. Advances in methodology and increased expectations for evaluation must be considered to ensure quality and credibility of qualitative rehabilitation research within rehabilitation. Improved quality and credibility may increase likelihood of research dissemination and use by clinicians intervening within the rehabilitation process in order to improve clinical practice. In order to maximize opportunities and mitigate challenges there are two principal future directions for rehabilitation scientists to consider: (1) advancing training in qualitative methods to adequately prepare future rehabilitation scientists and (2) engaging qualitative communities of research.
随着时间的推移,定性研究在康复科学领域产生了重大影响。在过去20年中,每年发表在《残疾与康复》上的定性研究数量显著增加(从1篇增至54篇)。此外,在此期间,定性研究在概念化、开展方式以及用于推动康复领域发展的方式上都发生了重大变化。本文旨在回顾迄今为止康复领域定性研究的进展,阐述当前的机遇与挑战,并提出未来方向,以继续加强定性研究在该领域的贡献。
在电子数据库和参考文献列表中进行了相关文献检索。对相关文献进行审查,以确定定性研究在康复应用中的当前机遇与挑战,并确定未来方向。
确定了六个机遇与挑战的关键领域:(a)范式转变;(b)方法学进展;(c)新兴技术;(d)质量评估进展;(e)混合方法途径日益普及;(f)知识转化方法不断演变。提出了康复领域未来两个重要方向:(1)定性方法的高级培训;(2)参与定性研究群体。
定性研究在康复领域已确立稳固地位,在该领域的持续发展中具有重要作用。定性研究人员和方法的持续发展至关重要。对康复的启示定性研究有潜力通过解决该领域一些最普遍关注的问题来改善康复实践,如从业者与患者的互动、残疾的主观体验和实际经历以及临床推理和决策。这将有助于为提供康复服务的人员提供更好的信息,从而使使用这些服务的患者受益。随着时间的推移,定性研究在概念化、开展方式以及用于推动康复科学发展的方式上的变化,导致了在康复领域使用定性研究时出现了一些独特的机遇和挑战,必须在该领域加以考虑。必须考虑方法学的进展以及对评估的更高期望,以确保康复领域定性康复研究的质量和可信度。提高质量和可信度可能会增加研究在康复过程中被临床医生传播和应用的可能性,从而改善临床实践。为了最大限度地利用机遇并应对挑战,康复科学家未来有两个主要方向需要考虑:(1)推进定性方法培训,以便为未来的康复科学家做好充分准备;(2)参与定性研究群体。