Edelstein D A, Florescu I
"Bagdasar Arseni" Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Floreasca Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
J Med Life. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):255-258.
The objective of this study was to determine the compared results of both the reconstruction surgery and the amputation in severe crushing of the foot, which led to open fractures. Prospective. Two major trauma hospitals (Floreasca Clinical Emergency Hospital and "Bagdasar Arseni" Clinical Emergency Hospital) from the university center in Bucharest. 21 patients, who sustained crushing of the foot with resulting Gustilo type III open fractures, were involved. The exclusion criteria were represented by open fractures that had very gross destructions of the neurovascular bundle, for which the amputation was the only solution, with no modality to reconstruct whatsoever. An immediate amputation (at 24, 48 hours after a thorough debridement, proper patient resuscitation, and detailed imaging investigation - the technique of delayed emergency) and reconstruction surgery were performed. Three variables were used: the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the residual pain and the number of rehospitalizations for secondary surgical procedures. When comparing the two lots of patients, first in which the amputation patients were included and second in which the reconstruction patients were included, it was noticed that there was a less favorable prognostic in the second lot for a three-year follow up period. The patients with a mangled foot, in which reconstruction surgery of the bone and soft tissue envelope was performed, had a worse prognostic than those who had an amputation as a first intention. : SIP = Sickness Impact Profile, VAS = Visual Analogue Scale, MVA = Motor Vehicle Accident, STSG = Split Thickness Skin Graft.
本研究的目的是确定足部严重挤压伤导致开放性骨折时,重建手术与截肢手术的对比结果。前瞻性研究。来自布加勒斯特大学中心的两家大型创伤医院(弗洛雷斯卡临床急救医院和“巴格达萨尔·阿尔塞尼”临床急救医院)。纳入了21例足部遭受挤压伤并导致 Gustilo Ⅲ型开放性骨折的患者。排除标准为神经血管束严重受损的开放性骨折,对于此类骨折,截肢是唯一的解决办法,不存在任何重建方式。进行了即刻截肢(在彻底清创、患者适当复苏以及详细影像学检查后24、48小时进行——延迟急诊技术)和重建手术。使用了三个变量:疾病影响量表(SIP)评分、残余疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及二次手术的再次住院次数。在比较两批患者时,第一批纳入截肢患者,第二批纳入重建患者,结果发现在三年随访期内第二批患者的预后较差。接受骨和软组织包膜重建手术的足部严重毁损患者的预后比那些一开始就接受截肢手术的患者更差。:SIP = 疾病影响量表,VAS = 视觉模拟量表,MVA = 机动车事故,STSG = 中厚皮片移植