Johansson H, Sjölander P, Sojka P, Wadell I
Department of Physiology, University of Umeå, Sweden.
Neurosci Res. 1989 Aug;6(6):537-55. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(89)90043-6.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the extent to which skin receptors might influence the responses of primary muscle spindle afferents via reflex actions on the fusimotor system. The experiments were performed on 43 cats anaesthetized with alpha-chloralose. The alterations in fusimotor activity were assessed from changes in the responses of the muscle spindle afferents to sinusoidal stretching of their parent muscles (triceps surae and plantaris). The mean rate of firing and the modulation of the afferent response were determined. Control measurements were made in absence of any cutaneous stimulation. Tests were made (a) during physiological stimulation of skin afferents of the ipsilateral pad or of the contralateral hindlimb, or (b) during repetitive electrical stimulation of the sural nerve in the ipsilateral hindlimb, or of sural or superficial peroneal nerve in the contralateral hindlimb. Of the total number of 113 units tested with repetitive electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral sural nerve (at 20 Hz), 24.8% exhibited predominantly dynamic fusimotor reflexes, 5.3% mixed or predominantly static fusimotor reflexes. One unit studied in a preparation with intact spinal cord exhibited static reflexes at low stimulation intensities and dynamic ones at higher stimulation strengths. The remaining units (69%) were uninfluenced. When the receptor-bearing muscle was held at constant length and a train of stimuli (at 20 Hz) was applied to the ipsilateral sural nerve, the action potentials in the primary muscle spindle afferent could be stimulus-locked to the 3rd or 4th pulse in the train (and to the pulses following thereafter), with a latency of about 24 ms from the effective pulse. This 1:1 pattern of driving seemed to be mediated via static and/or dynamic fusimotor neurons. Natural stimulation influenced comparatively few units (3 of 65 units tested from the ipsilateral pad and 10 of 98 tested from the contralateral hindlimb), but when the effects were present they were quite large. The results are discussed in relation to previous studies on reflex control of fusimotor neurones from cutaneous afferents. It is suggested that the wide range of fusimotor effects from cutaneous afferent fibres observed in this study (from complete absence of any effect, via moderate excitatory and inhibitory effects, to the 'driving pattern', i.e. pulse-to-pulse response) may reflect that different gamma-motoneurones have individualized reflex profiles, and it may also indicate that groups of fusimotor neurones and spindle afferents play specific roles in different motor acts.
本研究的目的是探讨皮肤感受器通过对梭内肌运动系统的反射作用,对初级肌梭传入纤维反应的影响程度。实验在43只用α-氯醛糖麻醉的猫身上进行。通过肌梭传入纤维对其所属肌肉(腓肠三头肌和跖肌)正弦拉伸反应的变化,评估梭内肌运动活性的改变。测定传入反应的平均放电率和调制情况。在没有任何皮肤刺激的情况下进行对照测量进行测试。测试分别在以下情况进行:(a) 同侧足垫或对侧后肢皮肤传入纤维的生理刺激期间;(b) 同侧后肢腓肠神经或对侧后肢腓肠神经或腓浅神经的重复电刺激期间。在用同侧腓肠神经重复电刺激(20 Hz)测试的113个单位中,24.8%主要表现为动态梭内肌运动反射,5.3%表现为混合或主要为静态梭内肌运动反射。在一个脊髓完整的标本中研究的一个单位,在低刺激强度下表现为静态反射,在高刺激强度下表现为动态反射。其余单位(69%)未受影响。当承载感受器的肌肉保持在恒定长度,并对同侧腓肠神经施加一串刺激(20 Hz)时,初级肌梭传入纤维中的动作电位可与刺激串中的第3或第4个脉冲(以及此后的脉冲)锁时,从有效脉冲起的潜伏期约为24 ms。这种1:1的驱动模式似乎是通过静态和/或动态梭内肌运动神经元介导的。自然刺激影响的单位相对较少(同侧足垫测试的65个单位中有3个,对侧后肢测试的98个单位中有10个),但当有影响时,影响相当大。结合先前关于皮肤传入纤维对梭内肌运动神经元反射控制的研究对结果进行了讨论。有人认为,本研究中观察到的皮肤传入纤维对梭内肌运动的广泛影响(从完全没有任何影响,到适度的兴奋和抑制作用,再到“驱动模式”,即逐脉冲反应)可能反映了不同的γ运动神经元具有个体化的反射特征,也可能表明梭内肌运动神经元群和梭传入纤维在不同的运动行为中发挥着特定的作用。