Almiron-Roig Eva, Domínguez Angélica, Vaughan David, Solis-Trapala Ivonne, Jebb Susan A
1MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory,Cambridge,CB1 9NL,UK.
3Department of Food and Tourism Management,Manchester Metropolitan University,Manchester,M15 6BH,UK.
Br J Nutr. 2016 Dec;116(11):1974-1983. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516004104. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
Exposure to large portion sizes is a risk factor for obesity. Specifically designed tableware may modulate how much is eaten and help with portion control. We examined the experience of using a guided crockery set (CS) and a calibrated serving spoon set (SS) by individuals trying to manage their weight. Twenty-nine obese adults who had completed 7-12 weeks of a community weight-loss programme were invited to use both tools for 2 weeks each, in a crossover design, with minimal health professional contact. A paper-based questionnaire was used to collect data on acceptance, perceived changes in portion size, frequency, and type of meal when the tool was used. Scores describing acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness were derived from five-point Likert scales from which binary indicators (high/low) were analysed using logistic regression. Mean acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness were moderate to high (3·7-4·4 points). Tool type did not have an impact on indicators of acceptance, ease of use and perceived effectiveness (P>0·32 for all comparisons); 55 % of participants used the CS on most days v. 21 % for the SS. The CS was used for all meals, whereas the SS was mostly used for evening meals. Self-selected portion sizes increased for vegetables and decreased for chips and potatoes with both tools. Participants rated both tools as equally acceptable, easy to use and with similar perceived effectiveness. Formal trials to evaluate the impact of such tools on weight control are warranted.
接触大份食物是肥胖的一个风险因素。专门设计的餐具可能会调节食物摄入量并有助于控制份量。我们研究了试图控制体重的个体使用带刻度餐具套装(CS)和校准量勺套装(SS)的体验。29名完成了7 - 12周社区减肥计划的肥胖成年人被邀请以交叉设计使用这两种工具,每种工具使用2周,且与健康专业人员的接触最少。使用纸质问卷收集关于使用工具时的接受度、对份量、用餐频率和用餐类型的感知变化的数据。描述接受度、易用性和感知有效性的分数来自五点李克特量表,并使用逻辑回归分析二元指标(高/低)。平均接受度、易用性和感知有效性为中等至高(3.7 - 4.4分)。工具类型对接受度、易用性和感知有效性指标没有影响(所有比较的P>0.32);55%的参与者在大多数日子使用CS,而使用SS的为21%。CS用于所有餐食,而SS主要用于晚餐。使用这两种工具时,自选的蔬菜份量增加,薯片和土豆份量减少。参与者认为这两种工具同样可接受、易于使用且感知有效性相似。有必要进行正式试验以评估此类工具对体重控制的影响。