Wang Tao, Wang Hui, Liu Huan, Ma Lei, Liu Feng-Yu, Ding Wen-Yuan
Department of Spinal Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5417. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005417.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate sagittal parameters in 2-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) (TLDS).A total of 15 patients with TLDS, 40 patients with single-level DS (SLDS), and 30 normal volunteers as control were included in our study. All subjects performed on full spine X-ray. Two categorized data were analyzed: patient characteristics-age, sex, body mass index, radiographic parameters-pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), PI-LL, Cobb between the fifth thoracic vertebral and 12th thoracic vertebral (T5-T12), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) Cobb angle of spondylolisthesis level (CSL), ratio of PT to SS (PT/SS), CSL/LL, variation trend of SS over PI, and LL over PI.The PI (73.1° vs 52.9°), SS (50.8° vs 32.2°), LL (53.1° vs 46.9°), SVA (66.1 vs 22.0 mm), PI-LL (20.0° vs 6.0°), and CSL (23.6° vs 20.0°) in TLDS were significantly larger than these in SLDS. The PI (73.1° vs 40.6°), PT (22.3° vs 17.1°), SS (50.8° vs 23.5°), LL (53.1° vs 32.5°), PI-LL (20.0° vs 8.1°), and SVA (66.1 vs 17.0 mm) in TLDS were significantly larger than those in the normal group (NG). The PI (52.9° vs 40.6°), PT (21.0° vs 17.1°), SS (32.2° vs 23.5°), LL (46.9° vs 32.5°), and SVA (22.0 vs 17.0 mm) in SLDS were significantly higher than those in NG. However, PT/SS (44.0%), LL over PI (y = 0.39x + 24.25), SS over PI (y = 10.79 + 0.55x) were lower in TLDS than these in SLDS (63.8%, y = 0.41x + 25, y = 0.65x - 2.09, respectively), and the similar tend between SLDS and NG (74.0%, y = 0.49x + 13.09, y = 0.67x - 3.9, respectively).Our results showed that 2-level lumbar DS, which was caused by multiple-factors, has a severe sagittal imbalance, but single-level has not any. When we plan for surgical selection for 2-level lumbar DS, global sagittal balance must be considered.
我们研究的目的是评估二级腰椎退行性椎体滑脱(DS)(TLDS)的矢状面参数。本研究共纳入15例TLDS患者、40例单节段DS(SLDS)患者以及30名正常志愿者作为对照。所有受试者均拍摄全脊柱X线片。分析了两类数据:患者特征(年龄、性别、体重指数)、影像学参数(骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、PI-LL、第5胸椎至第12胸椎(T5-T12)之间的Cobb角、矢状垂直轴(SVA)、椎体滑脱节段的Cobb角(CSL)、PT与SS的比值(PT/SS)、CSL/LL、SS随PI的变化趋势以及LL随PI的变化趋势)。TLDS患者的PI(73.1°对52.9°)、SS(50.8°对32.2°)、LL(53.1°对46.9°)、SVA(66.1对22.0mm)、PI-LL(20.0°对6.0°)和CSL(23.6°对20.0°)均显著大于SLDS患者。TLDS患者的PI(73.1°对40.6°)、PT(22.3°对17.1°)、SS(50.8°对23.5°)、LL(53.1°对32.5°)、PI-LL(20.0°对8.1°)和SVA(66.1对17.0mm)均显著大于正常组(NG)。SLDS患者的PI(52.9°对40.6°)、PT(21.0°对17.1°)、SS(32.2°对23.5°)、LL(46.9°对32.5°)和SVA(22.0对17.0mm)均显著高于NG。然而,TLDS患者的PT/SS(44.0%)、LL随PI的变化(y = 0.39x + 24.25)、SS随PI的变化(y = 10.79 + 0.55x)低于SLDS患者(分别为63.8%、y = 0.41x + 25、y = 0.65x - 2.09),且SLDS与NG之间有相似趋势(分别为74.0%、y = 0.49x + 13.09、y = 0.67x - 3.9)。我们的结果表明,由多种因素引起的二级腰椎DS存在严重的矢状面失衡,而单节段则没有。当我们为二级腰椎DS制定手术方案时,必须考虑整体矢状面平衡。