• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恐惧回避评定量表:基于访谈的量表的心理测量学评估

The Phobic Avoidance Rating Scale: a psychometric evaluation of an interview-based scale.

作者信息

Hoffart A, Friis S, Martinsen E W

机构信息

Research Institute, Modum Bads Nervesanatorium, Vikersund, Norway.

出版信息

Psychiatr Dev. 1989 Spring;7(1):71-81.

PMID:2798397
Abstract

An interviewer rating scale for the measurement of (agora)phobic avoidance, the Phobic Avoidance Rating Scale (PARS), is described and psychometrically evaluated. The criteria of avoidance used are purported to correct weaknesses of the sets of criteria used in self-report instruments. Two samples with inpatients satisfying DSM-III-R criteria for unipolar depressive and/or anxiety disorder were studied. Intercorrelational and factor analyses revealed 3 dimensions among agoraphobic fears: separation fears, social fears and simple phobic fears. Overall, the 3 subscales constructed from these dimensions proved to have good reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change following treatment. The internal consistency of the social subscale seemed to be somewhat low. The PARS should be well suited to assess avoidance among agoraphobic patients on separate dimensions and to distinguish patients with agoraphobia from other psychiatric patients. It seems to be the first interviewer rated agoraphobic scale that is psychometrically investigated and should ideally be used for research purposes in combination with a self-report instrument.

摘要

本文介绍了一种用于测量(广场)恐惧症回避行为的访谈者评定量表——恐惧症回避评定量表(PARS),并对其进行了心理测量学评估。所采用的回避标准旨在纠正自我报告工具中使用的标准集的不足之处。对两组符合DSM-III-R单相抑郁和/或焦虑障碍标准的住院患者样本进行了研究。相互关联分析和因素分析揭示了广场恐惧症恐惧中的三个维度:分离恐惧、社交恐惧和单纯恐惧症恐惧。总体而言,由这些维度构建的三个子量表在治疗后显示出良好的信度、效度和对变化的敏感性。社交子量表的内部一致性似乎有点低。PARS应该非常适合在不同维度上评估广场恐惧症患者的回避行为,并将广场恐惧症患者与其他精神科患者区分开来。它似乎是第一个经过心理测量学研究的访谈者评定的广场恐惧症量表,理想情况下应与自我报告工具结合用于研究目的。

相似文献

1
The Phobic Avoidance Rating Scale: a psychometric evaluation of an interview-based scale.恐惧回避评定量表:基于访谈的量表的心理测量学评估
Psychiatr Dev. 1989 Spring;7(1):71-81.
2
[Validation of a scale for responsibility (Salkovskis Responsibility Scale)].[责任量表(索尔科夫斯基责任量表)的验证]
Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):229-37.
3
Panic Disorder Severity Scale: reliability and validity of the Turkish version.惊恐障碍严重程度量表:土耳其语版本的信度和效度
Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(1):8-16. doi: 10.1002/da.20011.
4
Pain-related anxiety and anxiety sensitivity across anxiety and depressive disorders.各类焦虑症和抑郁症中与疼痛相关的焦虑及焦虑敏感性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Aug;23(6):791-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
5
The claustrophobia scale: a psychometric evaluation.幽闭恐惧症量表:一项心理测量学评估。
Behav Res Ther. 2007 May;45(5):1053-64. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.004. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
6
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.
7
A psychometric reanalysis of the Albany Panic and Phobia Questionnaire.《奥尔巴尼恐慌与恐惧症问卷》的心理测量再分析
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Mar;43(3):337-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.03.004.
8
Cognitive factors in panic disorder, agoraphobic avoidance and agoraphobia.惊恐障碍、场所恐惧症回避及场所恐惧症中的认知因素。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Feb;46(2):282-91. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.002. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
9
A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.匈牙利情感气质的一项研究:TEMPS-A相对于TCI和NEO-PI-R的内部一致性和同时效度。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Feb;106(1-2):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
10
Four-dimensional Anxiety and Depression Scale: a preliminary psychometric report.四维焦虑抑郁量表:初步心理测量报告。
Anxiety. 1996;2(1):47-50. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:1<47::AID-ANXI7>3.0.CO;2-A.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive behavioral group therapy for panic disorder in a general clinical setting: a prospective cohort study with 12 to 31-years follow-up.认知行为团体疗法治疗一般临床环境中的惊恐障碍:一项前瞻性队列研究,随访时间为 12 至 31 年。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 May 24;20(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02679-w.