Almond R
Psychoanal Study Child. 1989;44:307-24. doi: 10.1080/00797308.1989.11822655.
In the spirit of Jerome Frank's (1973) pioneering studies of universal characteristics in psychotherapeutic change, I have tried to demonstrate that character development in Pride and Prejudice can be understood in terms of psychoanalytic process. In the course of this thesis certain observations have emerged. Change occurs in the context of a relationship intense enough to disturb the tendency of personality to homeostasis (engagement). The change-inducing relationship is composed of a sequence of effects and countereffects (mutual influence). For these influences to be salutory (therapeutic) there must be a directional pull provided by the attitude of the primary agent of change, a pull that resonates with important motivations of the object of change (directionality). In Pride and Prejudice we recurrently found self-concept, and particularly the question of worth, to be an important interface of these phenomena. As therapists we are familiar with this as a clinical issue. Study of the novel suggests that self-esteem may play a central role in motivating therapeutic change. This observation raises intriguing unanswered questions regarding the conceptualization of self-esteem in psychoanalytic thinking.
本着杰罗姆·弗兰克(1973年)对心理治疗变化中的普遍特征进行开创性研究的精神,我试图证明《傲慢与偏见》中的性格发展可以从精神分析过程的角度来理解。在本论文的撰写过程中,出现了一些观察结果。变化发生在一段强烈到足以扰乱人格趋于稳态倾向的关系背景下(参与)。引发变化的关系由一系列效应和反效应(相互影响)构成。为了使这些影响有益(具有治疗作用),变化的主要推动者的态度必须提供一种定向拉力,这种拉力与变化对象的重要动机产生共鸣(方向性)。在《傲慢与偏见》中,我们反复发现自我概念,尤其是价值问题,是这些现象的一个重要交汇点。作为治疗师,我们对此作为一个临床问题很熟悉。对这部小说的研究表明,自尊可能在推动治疗性变化中发挥核心作用。这一观察结果引发了关于精神分析思维中自尊概念化的有趣且未得到解答的问题。