• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于血管内动脉瘤封堵的Nellix系统的一年关键试验结果。

One-year pivotal trial outcomes of the Nellix system for endovascular aneurysm sealing.

作者信息

Carpenter Jeffrey P, Cuff Robert, Buckley Clifford, Healey Christopher, Hussain Sajjad, Reijnen Michel M P J, Trani Jose, Böckler Dittmar

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Mich.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):330-336.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.024
PMID:27986486
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System (Endologix, Inc, Irvine, Calif) is a novel approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment whereby polymer is used to fill the AAA sac. We report 1-year results of the investigational device exemption pivotal trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients were treated at 30 sites in the United States and Europe. Inclusion criteria required an asymptomatic infrarenal AAA, with a neck length ≥10 mm and ≤60° angle, iliac artery blood lumen diameter 9 to 35 mm, access artery diameter ≥6 mm, and serum creatinine ≤2 mg/dL. Follow-up included computed tomography angiography scans at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year that were evaluated by a core laboratory. The primary safety end point was 30-day major adverse events (MAEs), which were compared with a performance goal of <56% (the Society for Vascular Surgery open repair control group rate). The primary effectiveness end point was treatment success at 1 year, which was compared with a performance goal of >80%. Treatment success required procedural technical success and absence of AAA rupture during follow-up, conversion to open surgical repair, endoleak (type I or III) at 1 year, migration >10 mm causing complications or requiring secondary intervention, aneurysm enlargement, or secondary procedures through 1 year for resolution of endoleak, device obstruction or occlusion, or device defect.

RESULTS

Of 150 treated patients, 149 (99.3%) completed 1-year follow-up. The MAEs rate at 30 days was 2.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-6.7%), satisfying the primary safety end point (<56%). The 1-year treatment success was 94% (95% confidence interval, 88.6%-97.4%), achieving the primary effectiveness end point (>80%). At 1 year, key secondary outcomes included 6.7% MAEs, 4.7% serious device-related events, 1.3% AAA-related mortality, 3.7% secondary interventions, and 0.7% surgical conversions. MAEs through 1 year included death (n = 6), stroke (n = 3), bowel ischemia (n = 2), renal failure (n = 2), respiratory failure (n = 2), and myocardial infarction (n =1). One iatrogenic AAA rupture occurred and one AAA rupture was reported during follow-up. AAA sac enlargement (>5 mm) was 1.5% at 1 year. Endoleaks were present in four patients (3.1%) at 1 year (1 type Ib and 3 type II). Migration >10 mm occurred in three patients (2.3%), but none required secondary intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes with this novel endovascular therapy for AAA, the Nellix EVAS System, are encouraging. The primary safety and effectiveness end points have been met. Low morbidity, low mortality, and high procedural and treatment success were achieved despite the inevitability of a learning curve and unique risks associated with a new device and technique. Long-term follow-up is in progress.

摘要

目的

Nellix 血管内动脉瘤封闭(EVAS)系统(Endologix 公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)是一种治疗腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的新方法,该方法使用聚合物填充 AAA 瘤腔。我们报告了该研究性器械豁免关键试验的 1 年结果。

方法

符合条件的患者在美国和欧洲的 30 个地点接受治疗。纳入标准要求为无症状性肾下腹主动脉瘤,瘤颈长度≥10 mm 且角度≤60°,髂动脉血腔直径 9 至 35 mm,入路动脉直径≥6 mm,血清肌酐≤2 mg/dL。随访包括在 30 天、6 个月和 1 年时进行计算机断层扫描血管造影扫描,并由核心实验室进行评估。主要安全终点是 30 天主要不良事件(MAE),将其与<56%(血管外科学会开放修复对照组发生率)的性能目标进行比较。主要有效性终点是 1 年时的治疗成功,将其与>80%的性能目标进行比较。治疗成功需要手术技术成功且在随访期间无 AAA 破裂、未转为开放手术修复、1 年时无内漏(I 型或 III 型)、移位>10 mm 导致并发症或需要二次干预、动脉瘤增大,或在 1 年内无因内漏、器械阻塞或闭塞或器械缺陷而进行的二次手术以解决问题。

结果

150 例接受治疗的患者中,149 例(99.3%)完成了 1 年随访。30 天时的 MAE 发生率为 2.7%(95%置信区间,0.7%-6.7%),达到主要安全终点(<56%)。1 年时的治疗成功率为 94%(95%置信区间,88.6%-97.4%),达到主要有效性终点(>80%)。1 年时的关键次要结局包括 6.7%的 MAE、4.7%的严重器械相关事件、1.3%的 AAA 相关死亡率、3.7%的二次干预和 0.7%的手术转换。1 年期间的 MAE 包括死亡(n = 6)、中风(n = 3)、肠缺血(n = 2)、肾衰竭(n = 2)、呼吸衰竭(n = 2)和心肌梗死(n = 1)。随访期间发生 1 例医源性 AAA 破裂,报告 1 例 AAA 破裂。1 年时 AAA 瘤腔增大(>5 mm)为 1.5%。1 年时 4 例患者(3.1%)存在内漏(1 例 Ib 型和 3 例 II 型)。3 例患者(2.3%)移位>10 mm,但均无需二次干预。

结论

这种用于 AAA 的新型血管内治疗方法 Nellix EVAS 系统的结果令人鼓舞。主要安全和有效性终点均已达到。尽管存在学习曲线以及与新器械和技术相关的独特风险,但仍实现了低发病率、低死亡率以及高手术和治疗成功率。长期随访正在进行中。

相似文献

1
One-year pivotal trial outcomes of the Nellix system for endovascular aneurysm sealing.用于血管内动脉瘤封堵的Nellix系统的一年关键试验结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):330-336.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
2
Results of the Nellix system investigational device exemption pivotal trial for endovascular aneurysm sealing.用于血管内动脉瘤封堵的Nellix系统研究性器械豁免关键试验结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):23-31.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.096. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
3
Preliminary results of endovascular aneurysm sealing from the multicenter Italian Research on Nellix Endoprosthesis (IRENE) study.Nellix 血管内动脉瘤封闭系统的多中心意大利研究(IRENE)的初步结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 May;67(5):1397-1403. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
4
Multicenter Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing system experience in aneurysm sac sealing.多中心 Nellix 血管内动脉瘤封堵系统在动脉瘤囊封堵方面的经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;62(2):290-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.03.031. Epub 2015 May 5.
5
One-year multicenter results of 100 abdominal aortic aneurysm patients treated with the Endurant stent graft.100 例腹主动脉瘤患者采用 Endurant 支架移植物治疗的 1 年多中心结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.053. Epub 2011 May 28.
6
Outcome of the pivotal study of the Aptus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysms repair system.Aptus 血管内腹主动脉瘤修复系统关键研究结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):275-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.02.017.
7
Fourteen-year outcomes of abdominal aortic endovascular repair with the Zenith stent graft.使用Zenith覆膜支架进行腹主动脉腔内修复的14年随访结果
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.117. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
8
Management of Nellix migration and type Ia endoleak from proximal endovascular aneurysm sealing relining to late open conversion.从近端血管内动脉瘤封堵衬里到晚期开放转换对 Nellix 移位和 Ia 型内漏的处理
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1204-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.035. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
Results of endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms using the Endurant stent graft.使用 Endurant 支架移植物进行腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.031. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
10
New results with 100 Excluder cases.100例排除病例的新结果。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Aug;51(4):475-80.

引用本文的文献

1
ALTURA™ Stent Graft Shortening and Its Implications After EVAR.ALTURA™ 支架移植物缩短及其在腔内修复腹主动脉瘤后的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1157. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041157.
2
Incidence and Long-Term Implications of Type 2 Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic and Aortoiliac Aneurysms.腹主动脉和主髂动脉瘤血管腔内修复术后2型内漏的发生率及长期影响
Int J Angiol. 2023 Jul 25;33(4):282-287. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771344. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Midterm Outcomes With the Nellix Endograft Alone or With Chimneys.单独使用 Nellix 血管内移植物或联合烟囱技术的中期结果。
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024 Jun 22;62:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.06.001. eCollection 2024.
4
Endovascular Repair of a Failed Nellix Endograft Proximal Sealing Zone Using the Altura Stent-Graft: A Case Report and Literature Review.使用Altura覆膜支架修复失败的Nellix腔内移植物近端密封区:病例报告及文献综述
Vasc Specialist Int. 2023 Dec 4;39:39. doi: 10.5758/vsi.230076.
5
Feasibility of aortic aneurysm sac embolization using a novel shape memory polymer embolic device.采用新型形状记忆聚合物栓塞装置进行主动脉瘤囊内栓塞的可行性。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Apr 3;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00328-x.
6
Mortality analysis of endovascular aneurysm sealing versus endovascular aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤密封与血管内动脉瘤修复的死亡率分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Mar;77(3):731-740.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.030. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
7
A Case of Late Type Ia Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix System: Proximal Extension with Triple Chimney and Gutter Endoleak Embolization.一例使用Nellix系统进行血管内动脉瘤封堵术后迟发性Ia型内漏病例:采用三烟囱技术近端延伸及沟内漏栓塞治疗
Ann Vasc Dis. 2021 Dec 25;14(4):393-395. doi: 10.3400/avd.cr.21-00092.
8
Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.择期血管内动脉瘤封闭与血管内动脉瘤修复的中期结果的系统评价。
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jun;29(3):457-467. doi: 10.1177/15266028211047941. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
The Fluid-Dynamics of Endo Vascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System failure.血管内动脉瘤密封(EVAS)系统故障的流体动力学。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2021 Jun;12(3):300-310. doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00520-3. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
10
Migration After Endovasclar Aneurysm Sealing in Conjunction With Chimney Grafts.血管内动脉瘤封堵联合烟囱型移植物后的移位
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Feb;28(1):165-172. doi: 10.1177/1526602820957279. Epub 2020 Sep 10.