Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 0200, Australia.
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Ecology. 2017 Mar;98(3):807-819. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1704. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
Habitat loss and fragmentation are major threats to biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Our current understanding of the impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation is based largely on studies that focus on either short-term or long-term responses. Short-term responses are often used to predict long-term responses and make management decisions. The lack of studies comparing short- and long-term responses to fragmentation means we do not adequately understand when and how well short-term responses can be extrapolated to predict long-term responses, and when or why they cannot. To address this gap, we used data from one of the world's longest-running fragmentation experiments, The Wog Wog Habitat Fragmentation Experiment. Using data for carabid beetles, we found that responses in the long term (more than 22 yr post-fragmentation ≈22 generations) often contrasted markedly with those in the short term (5 yr post-fragmentation). The total abundance of all carabids, species richness and the occurrence of six species declined in the short term in the fragments but increased over the long term. The occurrence of three species declined initially and continued to decline, whilst another species was positively affected initially but decreased in the long term. Species' responses to the matrix that surrounds the fragments strongly predicted both the direction (increase/decline in occurrence) and magnitude of their responses to fragmentation. Additionally, species' responses to the matrix were somewhat predicted by their preferences for different types of native habitat (open vs. shaded). Our study highlights the degree of the matrix's influence in fragmented landscapes, and how this influence can change over time. We urge caution in using short-term responses to forecast long-term responses in cases where the matrix (1) impacts species' responses to fragmentation (by isolating them, creating new habitat or altering fragment habitat) and (2) is likely to change through time.
生境丧失和破碎化是生物多样性和生态系统过程的主要威胁。我们目前对生境丧失和破碎化影响的理解主要基于关注短期或长期响应的研究。短期响应通常用于预测长期响应并做出管理决策。缺乏比较破碎化的短期和长期响应的研究意味着我们不能充分理解何时以及短期响应可以在多大程度上推断出预测长期响应,以及何时或为什么不能。为了解决这一差距,我们使用了世界上持续时间最长的破碎化实验之一——沃格沃格生境破碎化实验的数据。使用鞘翅目甲虫的数据,我们发现长期(破碎后超过 22 年,即 22 代以上)的响应通常与短期(破碎后 5 年)的响应明显不同。所有鞘翅目动物的总丰度、物种丰富度和六种物种的出现都在短期内减少,但在长期内增加。三种物种的出现最初减少并持续减少,而另一种物种最初受到积极影响,但在长期内减少。物种对包围片段的基质的反应强烈预测了它们对片段化的反应的方向(出现增加/减少)和幅度。此外,物种对基质的反应在一定程度上取决于它们对不同类型原生栖息地(开阔与遮荫)的偏好。我们的研究强调了基质在破碎景观中的影响程度,以及这种影响随时间的变化。我们敦促在以下情况下谨慎使用短期响应来预测长期响应:(1)基质影响物种对破碎化的响应(通过隔离它们、创造新栖息地或改变片段栖息地),(2)基质可能随时间而变化。