Blum Igor R, Younis Nadeem, Wilson Nairn H F
King's College London Dental Institute, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
King's College London Dental Institute, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
J Dent. 2017 Feb;57:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
To investigate opinions on, and current use of lining materials prior to the placement of posterior resin composite restorations by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the UK. A further objective was to investigate aspects of posterior resin composite restoration placement techniques employed by UK GDPs.
A questionnaire was devised to gain the information sought. It was sent to 500 UK dentists, chosen at random from the register of the General Dental Council.
Three hundred and fifty four replies were received, which gave a response rate of 71%. Eighty two percent of respondents reported placing lining materials in deep cavities to be restored with resin composite. Regarding moderately deep cavities, half of the respondents indicated a preference to place a lining material, whilst 44% were not sure if a lining was required. The remaining 6% did not respond to the question. Of the respondents, 39% reported that they did not place lining materials in shallow cavities. Regarding techniques for posterior resin composite placement, two-step etch and rinse systems were the most common adhesive bonding systems used (60%). The majority of respondents (80%) reported not using rubber dam when restoring posterior teeth with resin composite.
There was considerable confusion about the need to place a lining prior to resin composite restorations placement in moderate depth and shallow cavities, whilst most favoured the placement of a lining in deep posterior cavities. The majority of GDPs may not routinely use rubber dam for the placement of posterior resin composite restorations.
Decision making and operative techniques for cavity linings under posterior composite restorations in moderately deep and deep cavities is contentious among dentists, resulting in a need to generate more convincing, practice-relevant data on the use of lining materials to inform the dental profession.
调查英国普通牙科医生(GDPs)在放置后牙树脂复合材料修复体之前对衬层材料的看法及当前使用情况。另一个目的是调查英国GDPs采用的后牙树脂复合材料修复体放置技术的相关方面。
设计了一份问卷以获取所需信息。问卷被发送给从英国牙科总会登记册中随机挑选的500名英国牙医。
共收到354份回复,回复率为71%。82%的受访者报告在要用树脂复合材料修复的深龋洞中放置衬层材料。对于中深龋洞,一半的受访者表示倾向于放置衬层材料,而44%不确定是否需要衬层。其余6%未回答该问题。在受访者中,39%报告他们不在浅龋洞中放置衬层材料。关于后牙树脂复合材料放置技术,两步酸蚀冲洗系统是最常用的粘结系统(60%)。大多数受访者(80%)报告在用树脂复合材料修复后牙时不使用橡皮障。
在中深和浅龋洞中放置树脂复合材料修复体之前是否需要放置衬层存在相当大的困惑,而大多数人赞成在深的后牙龋洞中放置衬层。大多数普通牙科医生可能不会常规使用橡皮障来放置后牙树脂复合材料修复体。
在中深和深龋洞中后牙复合修复体下的洞衬决策和操作技术在牙医中存在争议,因此需要生成更有说服力、与临床实践相关的关于衬层材料使用的数据,为牙科行业提供参考。