Suppr超能文献

有或没有树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀衬层的后牙树脂复合树脂修复体:一项为期1年的随机临床试验。

Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.

作者信息

Banomyong Danuchit, Harnirattisai Choltacha, Burrow Michael F

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Melbourne Dental School, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Investig Clin Dent. 2011 Feb;2(1):63-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2010.00036.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the effect of resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining on the quality of posterior resin composite restorations, bonded with a two-step, total-etch or self-etching adhesive, at 1 year.

METHODS

Patients with 1-4 moderate-to-deep, primary occlusal caries in molars were informed and recruited. A total of 110 composite restorations were placed in 75 participants, with one of four restorative procedures: (a) bonded with a total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2); (b) lined with glass-ionomer cement (Fuji Lining LC), and then bonded with total-etch adhesive; (c) bonded with a self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond); and (d) lined with glass-ionomer cement, and then bonded with self-etching adhesive.

RESULTS

At 1 year, 57 patients (86 restorations) attended the recall. Each of the restorations was evaluated and scored from 1 (clinically excellent) to 5 (clinically poor) using the following criteria: (a) patient satisfaction; (b) fracture and retention; (c) marginal adaptation; (d) recurrent caries; and (e) post-operative sensitivity. At 1 year, the qualities of the restorations were not significantly affected by the placement of glass-ionomer cement lining, regardless of the adhesive used (P > 0.05). Most of the restorations were scored 1 for all criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of placing a glass-ionomer cement liner in resin composite restoration is questionable.

摘要

目的

研究树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀衬层对后牙树脂复合材料修复体质量的影响,这些修复体使用两步法全酸蚀或自酸蚀黏结剂黏结,观察时间为1年。

方法

告知并招募患有1 - 4颗磨牙中至深原发性咬合面龋的患者。75名参与者共进行了110次复合树脂修复,采用以下四种修复程序之一:(a)使用全酸蚀黏结剂(Single Bond 2)黏结;(b)先用玻璃离子水门汀(Fuji Lining LC)衬层,然后使用全酸蚀黏结剂黏结;(c)使用自酸蚀黏结剂(Clearfil SE Bond)黏结;(d)先用玻璃离子水门汀衬层,然后使用自酸蚀黏结剂黏结。

结果

1年后,57名患者(86个修复体)接受复查。根据以下标准对每个修复体进行评估并打分,从1分(临床效果极佳)到5分(临床效果差):(a)患者满意度;(b)折断和固位情况;(c)边缘适合性;(d)继发龋;(e)术后敏感情况。1年后,无论使用何种黏结剂,玻璃离子水门汀衬层的放置对修复体质量均无显著影响(P > 0.05)。大多数修复体在所有标准下的得分均为1分。

结论

在树脂复合材料修复中使用玻璃离子水门汀衬层的益处值得怀疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验