Suppr超能文献

与自行转诊的烟草戒烟热线登记者相比,传真转诊者的长期戒烟率。

Long-term Quit Rates in Fax-Referred as Compared to Self-Referred Tobacco Quitline Registrants.

作者信息

Mowls Dana S, Boeckman Lindsay, Gillaspy Stephen R, Beebe Laura A

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma;.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2017 Apr;52(4):e115-e121. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To increase the use of quitlines for treating tobacco use and dependence, quitline referral interventions are recommended for healthcare systems and providers. Research is limited as to whether fax-referred smokers have quit outcomes similar to those of traditional self-callers to quitlines.

METHODS

Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline registration data from March 2013 to October 2014 and 7-month follow-up data were used to compare hospital- and clinic-based fax-referred registrants (n=537) to self-callers (n=2,577). Contingency table chi-square tests and relative risks were used to identify differences in 30-day point prevalence abstinence at 7-month follow-up. Two-sided p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were conducted in 2015.

RESULTS

Fax-referred registrants versus self-callers were significantly more likely to be older (49.4 vs 47.6 years), white (70.6% vs 59.1%), non-Hispanic (96.8% vs 94.2%), and to have smoked fewer than one pack of cigarettes per day (54.0% vs 44.9%). Self-callers versus fax-referred registrants were significantly more likely to be uninsured (36.5% vs 29.4%) and have received nicotine-replacement therapy from the Helpline (92.3% vs 79.9%). At 7-month follow-up, a similar proportion of fax-referred registrants reported not using tobacco in the past 30 days as compared to self-callers (29.3% vs 31.8%, p=0.2945).

CONCLUSIONS

Although differences in sociodemographics, tobacco use behavior, and Helpline services were observed between fax-referred registrants and self-callers, quit outcomes at follow-up did not differ. This observational study has important implications for tobacco control initiatives as it shows patients fax-referred by hospitals and clinics to quitlines may be as successful as self-callers in quitting smoking.

摘要

引言

为了增加戒烟热线在治疗烟草使用和依赖方面的使用,建议医疗系统和提供者采用戒烟热线转诊干预措施。关于通过传真转诊的吸烟者的戒烟结果是否与传统的自行拨打戒烟热线者相似,相关研究有限。

方法

利用俄克拉荷马州烟草帮助热线2013年3月至2014年10月的注册数据以及7个月的随访数据,将基于医院和诊所传真转诊的注册者(n = 537)与自行拨打热线者(n = 2577)进行比较。使用列联表卡方检验和相对风险来确定7个月随访时30天点患病率戒断情况的差异。双侧p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。分析于2015年进行。

结果

与自行拨打热线者相比,传真转诊的注册者年龄显著更大(49.4岁对47.6岁),白人比例更高(70.6%对59.1%),非西班牙裔比例更高(96.8%对94.2%),且每天吸烟少于一包的比例更高(54.0%对44.9%)。自行拨打热线者与传真转诊的注册者相比,未参保的可能性显著更高(36.5%对29.4%),且从帮助热线接受尼古丁替代疗法的比例更高(92.3%对79.9%)。在7个月随访时,与自行拨打热线者相比,传真转诊的注册者报告在过去30天未使用烟草的比例相似(29.3%对31.8%,p = 0.2945)。

结论

尽管在传真转诊的注册者和自行拨打热线者之间观察到了社会人口统计学、烟草使用行为和帮助热线服务方面的差异,但随访时的戒烟结果并无不同。这项观察性研究对烟草控制举措具有重要意义,因为它表明医院和诊所传真转诊至戒烟热线的患者在戒烟方面可能与自行拨打热线者同样成功。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验