Mathew Amanda R, Burris Jessica L, Alberg Anthony J, Cummings K Michael, Carpenter Matthew J
Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA Department of Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2015 Feb;30(1):134-9. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu041. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
Quitline use can prompt quit attempts and promote abstinence among smokers, but rates of use are low and outcomes of brief quitline referrals unclear. In this study, a brief intervention was delivered to smokers who expressed motivation to quit in the next 30 days (N = 221) to encourage use of their state quitline. Correlates of quitline use were examined, and quitline callers versus non-callers were compared on the following outcomes at 2-month follow-up: cessation medication use, quit attempts and abstinence. Of the 221 smokers given a quitline referral, 34% called the quitline. Baseline motivation alone distinguished quitline callers from non-callers. Quitline use was positively associated with use of cessation medication, an association that remained robust even after adjusting for baseline motivation to quit. A trend was observed in which callers were marginally more likely than non-callers to report both a 24-h quit attempt and 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Relative to non-callers, callers also endorsed greater confidence to quit and increased self-efficacy to resist smoking temptations at follow-up. This study demonstrates a minimal intervention can promote acceptance of quitlines and favorable cessation outcomes among smokers motivated to quit.
戒烟热线的使用可以促使吸烟者尝试戒烟并促进戒烟成功,但使用率较低,且简短的戒烟热线转介的效果尚不清楚。在本研究中,对表示有动力在未来30天内戒烟的吸烟者(N = 221)进行了简短干预,以鼓励他们使用所在州的戒烟热线。研究了戒烟热线使用的相关因素,并在2个月随访时比较了拨打戒烟热线者与未拨打者在以下结局方面的差异:使用戒烟药物、尝试戒烟和戒烟成功。在221名获得戒烟热线转介的吸烟者中,34%拨打了戒烟热线。仅基线时的动力就能区分拨打戒烟热线者和未拨打者。戒烟热线的使用与使用戒烟药物呈正相关,即使在调整了基线戒烟动力后,这种关联仍然很强。观察到一种趋势,即拨打热线者比未拨打者略微更有可能报告24小时戒烟尝试和7天点流行率戒烟成功。相对于未拨打者,拨打热线者在随访时也表示对戒烟更有信心,并且抵抗吸烟诱惑的自我效能有所提高。本研究表明,一种最小化干预可以促进有戒烟动力的吸烟者接受戒烟热线并获得良好的戒烟效果。