National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia; School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 15;580:367-379. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.181. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
Assessing recharge is critical to understanding groundwater and preventing pollution. Here, we investigate recharge in an Australian coastal aquifer using a combination of physical, modelling and geochemical techniques. We assess whether recharge may occur through a pervasive layer of floodplain muds that was initially hypothesized to be impermeable. At least 59% of the precipitation volume could be accounted for in the shallow aquifer using the water table fluctuation method during four significant recharge events. Precipitation events <20mm did not produce detectable aquifer recharge. The highest recharge rates were estimated in the area underneath the floodplain clay layer rather than in the sandy area. A steady-state chloride method implied recharge rates of at least 200mm/year (>14% of annual precipitation). Tritium dating revealed long term net vertical recharge rates ranging from 27 to 114mm/year (average 58mm/year) which were interpreted as minimum net long term recharge. Borehole experiments revealed more permeable conditions and heterogeneous infiltration rates when the floodplain soils were dry. Wet conditions apparently expand floodplain clays, closing macropores and cracks that act as conduits for groundwater recharge. Modelled groundwater flow paths were consistent with tritium dating and provided independent evidence that the clay layer does not prevent local recharge. Overall, all lines of evidence demonstrated that the coastal floodplain muds do not prevent the infiltration of rainwater into the underlying sand aquifer, and that local recharge across the muds was widespread. Therefore, assuming fine-grained floodplain soils prevent recharge and protect underlying aquifers from pollution may not be reasonable.
评估补给对于了解地下水和防止污染至关重要。在这里,我们使用物理、建模和地球化学技术组合来研究澳大利亚沿海含水层的补给情况。我们评估了补给是否可能通过最初假设为不透水的漫滩淤泥层发生。在四次重要的补给事件中,使用地下水位波动法可以解释浅含水层中至少 59%的降水体积。降水事件<20mm 不会产生可检测到的含水层补给。在漫滩粘土层下方区域估计的补给率最高,而不是在沙质区域。稳态氯方法暗示补给率至少为 200mm/年(>年降水量的 14%)。氚测年揭示了长期净垂直补给率范围从 27 到 114mm/年(平均 58mm/年),这被解释为最小长期净补给。当漫滩土壤干燥时,钻孔实验揭示了更具渗透性的条件和不均匀的入渗率。湿条件显然会使漫滩粘土膨胀,关闭作为地下水补给通道的大孔和裂缝。模拟的地下水流动路径与氚测年一致,并提供了独立的证据表明,粘土层不会阻止当地的补给。总体而言,所有证据都表明,沿海漫滩淤泥不会阻止雨水渗透到下面的砂含水层中,并且淤泥层上的局部补给很广泛。因此,假设细粒漫滩土壤会阻止补给并防止下面的含水层受到污染可能是不合理的。