Brazaitis Marius, Paulauskas Henrikas, Skurvydas Albertas, Budde Henning, Daniuseviciute Laura, Eimantas Nerijus
Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University Kaunas, Lithuania.
Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports UniversityKaunas, Lithuania; Faculty of Human Sciences, Medical School HamburgHamburg, Germany; Sports Science Department, Reykjavik UniversityReykjavik, Iceland.
Front Physiol. 2016 Dec 1;7:592. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00592. eCollection 2016.
It is well known that cold exposure experienced during occupational or recreational activities may adversely affect motor, cognitive performance, and health. Most research has used prolonged passive external rewarming modalities and focused on the direct effects on the kinetics of physiological and psychological responses in hypothermic subjects. However, the brief whole body rewarming effects on physiological and psychological responses in parallel with functional consequences on cognitive and neurophysiological functions have not been investigated. This study explores these effects in 12 healthy young men. Subjects (20 ± 1 years) participated in 4 randomized trials, which were designed to compare the effects of whole-body brief (5-min) rewarming in 37°C water with rewarming for the same duration in 24°C (air) thermoneutral environment in mildly hypothermic subjects. After each rewarming, indicators of neuromuscular function (reflexes, central activation ratio, electromyography of exercising muscle, and contractile properties of calf muscles) and cognitive function (attention, simple motor speed, and information processing speed) were assessed. Compared to rewarming in thermoneutral environment, after brief rewarming in 37°C water, significantly lower metabolic heat production (MHP) (206 ± 33.4 vs. 121.9 ± 24.3 W·m, < 0.01), heart rate (76 ± 16 vs. 60 ± 12 b·min, < 0.01), cold strain (6.4 ± 3.1 vs. 5.3 ± 2.7, < 0.01), improved thermal comfort and induced cessation of shivering were found. Electrically induced maximum torque amplitudes increased (P100, 102.8 ± 21.3 vs. 109.2 ± 17.5 Nm and PTT100, 83.1 ± 17.1 vs. 92.7 ± 16.0 Nm, < 0.05), contraction half-relaxation time decreased (599.0 ± 53.8 vs. 589.0 ± 56.3 ms, < 0.05), and M-wave latency shortened (17.5 ± 2.2 vs. 15.6 ± 2.0 ms, < 0.05) after 37°C water rewarming. Unlike rewarming in thermoneutral environment, 37°C water rewarming blunted the hypothermia-induced alterations in neural drive transmission (4.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.4 ± 0.8 mV H-reflex and 4.9 ± 0.2 vs. 4.4 ± 0.4 mV V-wave, < 0.05), which increased central fatigue during a 2-min maximum load ( < 0.05). Furthermore, only in brief warm water rewarming cerebral alterations were restored to the control level and it was indicated by shortened reaction times ( < 0.05). Brief rewarming in warm water rather than the same duration rewarming in thermoneutral environment blunted the hypothermia-induced alterations for sensation, motor drive, and cognition, despite the fact that rectal and deep muscle temperature remained lowered.
众所周知,在职业或娱乐活动中经历的寒冷暴露可能会对运动、认知能力和健康产生不利影响。大多数研究使用长时间的被动外部复温方式,并关注对体温过低受试者生理和心理反应动力学的直接影响。然而,短暂的全身复温对生理和心理反应以及对认知和神经生理功能的功能后果的影响尚未得到研究。本研究在12名健康年轻男性中探讨了这些影响。受试者(20±1岁)参与了4项随机试验,这些试验旨在比较轻度体温过低受试者在37°C水中进行5分钟全身短暂复温与在24°C(空气)热中性环境中进行相同持续时间复温的效果。每次复温后,评估神经肌肉功能指标(反射、中枢激活率、运动肌肉的肌电图以及小腿肌肉的收缩特性)和认知功能指标(注意力、简单运动速度和信息处理速度)。与在热中性环境中复温相比,在37°C水中短暂复温后,发现代谢产热(MHP)显著降低(206±33.4 vs. 121.9±24.3 W·m,P<0.01)、心率(76±16 vs. 60±12 b·min,P<0.01)、冷应激(6.4±3.1 vs. 5.3±2.7,P<0.01),热舒适度提高且颤抖停止。37°C水复温后,电诱发最大扭矩幅度增加(P100,102.8±21.3 vs. 109.2±17.5 Nm以及PTT100,83.1±17.1 vs. 92.7±16.0 Nm,P<0.05),收缩半松弛时间缩短(599.0±53.8 vs. 589.0±56.3 ms,P<0.05),M波潜伏期缩短(17.5±2.2 vs. 15.6±2.0 ms,P<0.05)。与在热中性环境中复温不同,37°C水复温减弱了体温过低引起的神经驱动传递改变(4.3±0.5 vs. 3.4±0.8 mV H反射以及4.9±0.2 vs. 4.4±0.4 mV V波,P<0.05),这在2分钟最大负荷期间增加了中枢疲劳(P<0.05)。此外,仅在短暂温水复温中大脑改变恢复到对照水平,这通过反应时间缩短得以表明(P<0.05)。尽管直肠和深部肌肉温度仍然较低,但与在热中性环境中相同持续时间的复温相比,在温水中短暂复温减弱了体温过低引起的感觉、运动驱动和认知改变。