Seims Aaron D, VanHouwelingen Lisa, Mead Jessica, Mao Shenghua, Loh Amos, Sandoval John A, Davidoff Andrew M, Wu Jianrong, Wang Winfred C, Fernandez-Pineda Israel
1 Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, Tennessee.
2 Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, Tennessee.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Feb;27(2):206-210. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0309. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Laparoscopy offers many benefits to splenectomy, such as reduced incisional pain and shortened hospital duration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate procedural and outcome differences between multiport (MP) and reduced port (RP) splenectomy when utilized to treat children.
An institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of all consecutive laparoscopic total splenectomies performed at a single institution between January 2010 and October 2015 was conducted. We evaluated demographics, surgical technique, instance of conversion, operative duration, estimated blood loss, need for intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative length of stay, time to full feeds, complications, and follow-up duration.
Over a 5-year period, 66 patients less than 20 years of age underwent laparoscopic total splenectomy. RP splenectomy was attempted in 14 patients. The remaining 52 were MP operations. Populations were comparable with regard to demographics. Preoperative splenic volumes (mL) were greater in the RP population (median [IQR]: 1377 [747-1508] versus 452 [242-710], P = .039). RP splenectomy demonstrated no difference compared to MP splenectomy in operative time (153 versus 138 minutes, P = .360), estimated blood loss (120 versus 154 mL, P = .634), or percent of cases requiring intraoperative blood transfusion (14 versus 23, P = .716). By the first postoperative day, 57% of RP and 17% of MP patients could be discharged (P = .005). Thirty-day readmission rates were similar, at 7% for RP and 8% for MP operations. Fever was the indication for all readmissions. Mean duration of follow-up is 28 months for MP and 13 months for RP cases.
A reduced number of ports can be safely utilized for total splenectomy in pediatric patients without increasing procedural duration or need for intraoperative blood transfusion. In addition, rate of discharge on the first postoperative day was significantly higher in the RP splenectomy group.
腹腔镜手术为脾切除术带来诸多益处,如减轻切口疼痛和缩短住院时间。本研究旨在评估多端口(MP)和减少端口(RP)脾切除术在治疗儿童时的手术过程及结果差异。
对2010年1月至2015年10月在单一机构进行的所有连续腹腔镜全脾切除术进行机构审查委员会批准的回顾性分析。我们评估了人口统计学特征、手术技术、中转情况、手术时间、估计失血量、术中输血需求、术后住院时间、完全恢复进食时间、并发症及随访时间。
在5年期间,66例20岁以下患者接受了腹腔镜全脾切除术。14例患者尝试进行RP脾切除术。其余52例为MP手术。两组患者在人口统计学特征方面具有可比性。RP组患者术前脾体积(mL)更大(中位数[四分位间距]:1377[747 - 1508]对452[242 - 710],P = 0.039)。RP脾切除术与MP脾切除术在手术时间(153对138分钟,P = 0.360)、估计失血量(120对154 mL,P = 0.634)或术中需要输血的病例百分比(14对23,P = 0.716)方面无差异。术后第一天,57%的RP患者和17%的MP患者可以出院(P = 0.005)。30天再入院率相似,RP手术为7%,MP手术为8%。所有再入院均因发热。MP组的平均随访时间为28个月,RP组为13个月。
在小儿患者的全脾切除术中,减少端口数量可安全使用,且不增加手术时间或术中输血需求。此外,RP脾切除术组术后第一天出院率显著更高。