Ontweka Lameck N, Deng Lul O, Rauzier Jean, Debes Amanda K, Tadesse Fisseha, Parker Lucy A, Wamala Joseph F, Bior Bior K, Lasuba Michael, But Abiem Bona, Grandesso Francesco, Jamet Christine, Cohuet Sandra, Ciglenecki Iza, Serafini Micaela, Sack David A, Quilici Marie-Laure, Azman Andrew S, Luquero Francisco J, Page Anne-Laure
Médecins Sans Frontières Operational Center Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amref Health Africa Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 19;11(12):e0168257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168257. eCollection 2016.
Cholera rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) could play a central role in outbreak detection and surveillance in low-resource settings, but their modest performance has hindered their broad adoption. The addition of an enrichment step may improve test specificity. We describe the results of a prospective diagnostic evaluation of the Crystal VC RDT (Span Diagnostics, India) with enrichment step and of culture, each compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR), during a cholera outbreak in South Sudan. RDTs were performed on alkaline peptone water inoculated with stool and incubated for 4-6 hours at ambient temperature. Cholera culture was performed from wet filter paper inoculated with stool. Molecular detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 by PCR was done from dry Whatman 903 filter papers inoculated with stool, and from wet filter paper supernatant. In August and September 2015, 101 consecutive suspected cholera cases were enrolled, of which 36 were confirmed by PCR. The enriched RDT had 86.1% (95% CI: 70.5-95.3) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 94.4-100) specificity compared to PCR as the reference standard. The sensitivity of culture versus PCR was 83.3% (95% CI: 67.2-93.6) for culture performed on site and 72.2% (95% CI: 54.8-85.8) at the international reference laboratory, where samples were tested after an average delay of two months after sample collection, and specificity was 98.5% (95% CI: 91.7-100) and 100% (95% CI: 94.5-100), respectively. The RDT with enrichment showed performance comparable to that of culture and could be a sustainable alternative to culture confirmation where laboratory capacity is limited.
霍乱快速诊断检测(RDT)在资源匮乏地区的疫情检测和监测中可发挥核心作用,但其表现平平阻碍了其广泛应用。增加一个富集步骤可能会提高检测特异性。我们描述了在南苏丹霍乱疫情期间,对采用富集步骤的Crystal VC RDT(印度斯潘诊断公司)和培养法进行前瞻性诊断评估的结果,将二者分别与聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行比较。RDT检测是在接种粪便的碱性蛋白胨水中进行,并在室温下孵育4至6小时。霍乱培养是从接种粪便的湿滤纸上进行的。通过PCR对霍乱弧菌O1进行分子检测是从接种粪便的干Whatman 903滤纸上以及湿滤纸上清液中进行的。2015年8月和9月,连续纳入了101例疑似霍乱病例,其中36例经PCR确诊。以PCR作为参考标准,富集后的RDT灵敏度为86.1%(95%置信区间:70.5 - 95.3),特异性为100%(95%置信区间:94.4 - 100)。现场进行培养与PCR相比的灵敏度为83.3%(95%置信区间:67.2 - 93.6),在国际参考实验室进行培养的灵敏度为72.2%(95%置信区间:54.8 - 85.8),在国际参考实验室,样本在采集后平均延迟两个月后进行检测,特异性分别为98.5%(95%置信区间:91.7 - 100)和100%(95%置信区间:94.5 - 100)。采用富集步骤的RDT表现与培养法相当,在实验室能力有限的情况下,可成为培养确诊的可持续替代方法。