Krag P J, Licht R W, Nielsen R E
Unit for Psychiatric Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark.
Unit for Psychiatric Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;40:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
There is a long tradition of reaction time studies in experimental psychopathology. Even though a diminishing interest in this paradigm has been seen over the last years, it is in line with more recent biological approaches to examine psychiatric disorders cross-diagnostically.
Patients (n=95) with a positive subtype of schizophrenia (n=22), a negative subtype of schizophrenia (n=18), a full major depressive episode (n=19), a full manic episode (n=16), or a mood disorder in remission (n=20) and subjects with no known psychiatric disorder (n=30), respectively, participated in a computer-based reaction time test consisting of four trials with 55 short visual and auditory stimuli presented in a random sequence. Each participant's median reaction time in milliseconds to light stimuli ipsimodal (light preceded by light) and cross-modal (light preceded by tone) and the difference between the two conditions (i.e. cross-modal retardation (CMR) to light) were recorded. Likewise, the median reaction time to tone stimuli ipsimodal and cross-modal and the difference between the two (CMR to tone) were recorded.
Patient groups performed worse than the control group, with the exception of the group of patients with mood disorders in remission in both CMRs. When comparing patient groups, the schizophrenia negative subtype performed worse than the remission group in both CMRs.
Our data support newer theories about underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and observable behavioural phenomena occurring across the different diagnostic categories, thereby supporting a dimensional approach in the diagnosis and clinical management.
在实验精神病理学中,反应时间研究有着悠久的传统。尽管在过去几年中对这一范式的兴趣有所下降,但它与最近从生物学角度对精神疾病进行跨诊断研究的方法是一致的。
分别选取精神分裂症阳性亚型患者(n = 22)、精神分裂症阴性亚型患者(n = 18)、重度抑郁发作患者(n = 19)、躁狂发作患者(n = 16)、缓解期情绪障碍患者(n = 20)以及无已知精神疾病的受试者(n = 30),参与一项基于计算机的反应时间测试,该测试由四个试验组成,以随机顺序呈现55个短视觉和听觉刺激。记录每位参与者对同侧模式(光之前为光)和跨模式(光之前为音调)光刺激的毫秒级中位反应时间,以及两种条件之间的差异(即对光的跨模式延迟(CMR))。同样,记录对同侧模式和跨模式音调刺激的中位反应时间以及两者之间的差异(对音调的CMR)。
除缓解期情绪障碍患者组在两种CMR中表现外,患者组的表现均比对照组差。在比较患者组时,精神分裂症阴性亚型在两种CMR中的表现均比缓解期组差。
我们的数据支持了关于不同诊断类别中潜在病理生理机制和可观察到的行为现象的新理论,从而支持了诊断和临床管理中的维度方法。