Jahn Michael, Vorpahl Carsten, Hübschmann Thomas, Harms Hauke, Müller Susann
Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
School of Biotechnology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Microb Cell Fact. 2016 Dec 19;15(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0610-8.
Plasmids are widely used for molecular cloning or production of proteins in laboratory and industrial settings. Constant modification has brought forth countless plasmid vectors whose characteristics in terms of average plasmid copy number (PCN) and stability are rarely known. The crucial factor determining the PCN is the replication system; most replication systems in use today belong to a small number of different classes and are available through repositories like the Standard European Vector Architecture (SEVA).
In this study, the PCN was determined in a set of seven SEVA-based expression plasmids only differing in the replication system. The average PCN for all constructs was determined by Droplet Digital PCR and ranged between 2 and 40 per chromosome in the host organism Escherichia coli. Furthermore, a plasmid-encoded EGFP reporter protein served as a means to assess variability in reporter gene expression on the single cell level. Only cells with one type of plasmid (RSF1010 replication system) showed a high degree of heterogeneity with a clear bimodal distribution of EGFP intensity while the others showed a normal distribution. The heterogeneous RSF1010-carrying cell population and one normally distributed population (ColE1 replication system) were further analyzed by sorting cells of sub-populations selected according to EGFP intensity. For both plasmids, low and highly fluorescent sub-populations showed a remarkable difference in PCN, ranging from 9.2 to 123.4 for ColE1 and from 0.5 to 11.8 for RSF1010, respectively.
The average PCN determined here for a set of standardized plasmids was generally at the lower end of previously reported ranges and not related to the degree of heterogeneity. Further characterization of a heterogeneous and a homogeneous population demonstrated considerable differences in the PCN of sub-populations. We therefore present direct molecular evidence that the average PCN does not represent the true number of plasmid molecules in individual cells.
质粒在实验室和工业环境中广泛用于分子克隆或蛋白质生产。持续的修饰产生了无数的质粒载体,而其平均质粒拷贝数(PCN)和稳定性方面的特性却鲜为人知。决定PCN的关键因素是复制系统;当今使用的大多数复制系统属于少数不同类别,可通过诸如标准欧洲载体架构(SEVA)等资源库获得。
在本研究中,测定了一组仅在复制系统上不同的基于SEVA的七个表达质粒的PCN。通过液滴数字PCR确定所有构建体的平均PCN,在宿主生物大肠杆菌中每个染色体的范围为2至40。此外,质粒编码的EGFP报告蛋白用作评估单细胞水平上报告基因表达变异性的手段。只有携带一种质粒(RSF1010复制系统)的细胞显示出高度的异质性,EGFP强度呈明显的双峰分布,而其他细胞则呈正态分布。通过对根据EGFP强度选择的亚群细胞进行分选,进一步分析了携带异质性RSF1010的细胞群体和一个正态分布群体(ColE1复制系统)。对于这两种质粒,低荧光和高荧光亚群在PCN上显示出显著差异,ColE1分别为9.2至123.4,RSF1010为0.5至11.8。
此处测定的一组标准化质粒的平均PCN通常处于先前报道范围的下限,且与异质性程度无关。对异质群体和同质群体的进一步表征表明亚群的PCN存在相当大的差异。因此,我们提供了直接的分子证据,表明平均PCN并不代表单个细胞中质粒分子的真实数量。