Coroian Flavia, Jourdan Claire, Froger Jérome, Anquetil Claire, Choquet Olivier, Coulet Bertand, Laffont Isabelle
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Euromov, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
To study the results and complications of percutaneous needle tenotomy for superficial retracted tendons in patients with brain damage.
Prospective observational study.
University hospital.
Patients with severe brain damage (N=38; mean age, 60.7y; age range, 24-93y; 21 women) requiring surgical management of contractures and eligible for percutaneous needle tenotomy were enrolled between February 2015 and February 2016.
The percutaneous needle tenotomy gesture was performed by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician trained by an orthopedic surgeon, under local or locoregional anesthesia. Treated tendons varied among patients.
All patients were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months to assess surgical outcomes (joint range of motion [ROM], pain, and functional improvement) while screening for complications.
Improvements in ROM (37/38) and contractures-related pain (12/12) were satisfactory. Functional results were satisfactory (Goal Attainment Scale score ≥0) for most patients (37/38): nursing (n=12), putting shoes on (n=8), getting in bed or sitting on a chair (n=6), verticalization (n=7), transfers and gait (n=8), and grip (n=2). Five patients had complications related to the surgical gesture: cast-related complications (n=2), hand hematoma (n=2), and cutaneous necrosis of the Achilles tendon in a patient with previous obliterative arteriopathy of the lower limbs (n=1).
Percutaneous needle tenotomy yields good results in the management of selected superficial muscle and tendon contractures. The complications rate is very low, and this treatment can be an alternative to conventional surgery in frail patients with neurologic diseases.
研究经皮穿刺针刀切断术治疗脑损伤患者浅表挛缩肌腱的效果及并发症。
前瞻性观察研究。
大学医院。
2015年2月至2016年2月期间,纳入38例重度脑损伤患者(平均年龄60.7岁;年龄范围24 - 93岁;女性21例),这些患者需要手术治疗挛缩且适合经皮穿刺针刀切断术。
经皮穿刺针刀切断术由接受过骨科医生培训的物理医学与康复医师在局部或区域麻醉下进行。不同患者治疗的肌腱不同。
在1、3和6个月时对所有患者进行评估,以评估手术效果(关节活动范围[ROM]、疼痛和功能改善情况),同时筛查并发症。
ROM(37/38)和与挛缩相关的疼痛(12/12)改善情况令人满意。大多数患者(37/38)的功能结果令人满意(目标达成量表评分≥0):护理(n = 12)、穿鞋(n = 8)、上床或坐在椅子上(n = 6)、直立(n = 7)、转移和步态(n = 8)以及抓握(n = 2)。5例患者出现与手术操作相关的并发症:石膏相关并发症(n = 2)、手部血肿(n = 2)以及1例既往有下肢闭塞性动脉病患者的跟腱皮肤坏死(n = 1)。
经皮穿刺针刀切断术在治疗特定的浅表肌肉和肌腱挛缩方面效果良好。并发症发生率很低,对于体弱的神经疾病患者,这种治疗方法可作为传统手术的替代方案。