Suppr超能文献

青光眼或高眼压症患者使用固定复方制剂与非固定复方制剂的0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔的疗效比较:一项随机试验

Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Barnebey Howard S, Robin Alan L

机构信息

Specialty Eyecare Centre, Bellevue, Washington.

Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;176:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess adherence to treatment with fixed-combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% (TTFC) compared with separate containers of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5% (TRAV+TIM; unfixed) using electronic dosing aids.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, observer-masked clinical trial.

METHODS

setting: Two US clinical sites.

PATIENT POPULATION

Eligible patients were adults diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Patients (n = 81) were sequentially randomized 1:1 to receive TTFC or TRAV+TIM for 12 months.

INTERVENTION

TTFC was administered once daily in the morning or evening with a single dosing aid. Patients randomized to TRAV+TIM administered TRAV once daily in the evening and TIM once daily in the morning using separate dosing aids.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Adherence with administered medication, as recorded by the dosing aids.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD patient age was 60 ± 10 years; most patients were male and white. Compared with TRAV+TIM (n = 40), patients receiving TTFC (n = 41) were consistently adherent on a greater percentage of days through month 12 (60% vs 43%). At months 1, 3, 6, and 12, 80% adherence was achieved by 71% vs 38%, 53% vs 30%, 45% vs 16%, and 32% vs 11% of patients receiving TTFC vs TRAV+TIM, respectively. Significantly more patients were adherent on ≥80% of days with TTFC compared with TRAV+TIM (P < .001 to P = .041). Both treatments reduced IOP from baseline, and no safety issues were identified in either group. Ocular hyperemia was the most common treatment-related adverse event (n = 3/group).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving TTFC maintained better treatment adherence compared with patients receiving TRAV+TIM through 12 months of on-therapy evaluation. This suggests that, for patients requiring multiple IOP-lowering medications, a fixed combination may provide improved long-term adherence compared with unfixed therapy.

摘要

目的

使用电子给药辅助装置,评估与分别包装的0.004%曲伏前列素和0.5%噻吗洛尔(TRAV+TIM;非固定组合)相比,固定组合的0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔(TTFC)的治疗依从性。

设计

随机、对照、观察者盲法临床试验。

方法

地点:美国两个临床研究点。

患者人群

符合条件的患者为诊断为开角型青光眼或高眼压症的成年人。患者(n = 81)按1:1顺序随机分组,接受TTFC或TRAV+TIM治疗12个月。

干预措施

TTFC每天早晨或晚上使用单一给药辅助装置给药一次。随机接受TRAV+TIM的患者,晚上使用单独的给药辅助装置每天给药一次TRAV,早晨每天给药一次TIM。

主要观察指标

给药辅助装置记录的药物服用依从性。

结果

患者平均年龄±标准差为60±10岁;大多数患者为男性且为白人。与TRAV+TIM组(n = 40)相比,接受TTFC治疗的患者(n = 41)在第12个月期间的多数天数里依从性持续更高(60%对43%)。在第1、3、6和12个月时,接受TTFC治疗的患者分别有71%、53%、45%和32%达到80%的依从性,而接受TRAV+TIM治疗的患者分别为38%、30%、16%和11%。与TRAV+TIM相比,接受TTFC治疗且在≥80%天数里依从的患者显著更多(P <.001至P = 0.041)。两种治疗均使眼压从基线水平降低,且两组均未发现安全问题。眼部充血是最常见的与治疗相关的不良事件(每组n = 3)。

结论

在12个月的治疗评估期内,接受TTFC治疗的患者比接受TRAV+TIM治疗的患者保持了更好的治疗依从性。这表明,对于需要多种降低眼压药物的患者,与非固定组合治疗相比,固定组合可能提供更好的长期依从性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验