Barnebey Howard S, Robin Alan L
Specialty Eyecare Centre, Bellevue, Washington.
Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;176:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
To assess adherence to treatment with fixed-combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% (TTFC) compared with separate containers of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5% (TRAV+TIM; unfixed) using electronic dosing aids.
Randomized, controlled, observer-masked clinical trial.
setting: Two US clinical sites.
Eligible patients were adults diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Patients (n = 81) were sequentially randomized 1:1 to receive TTFC or TRAV+TIM for 12 months.
TTFC was administered once daily in the morning or evening with a single dosing aid. Patients randomized to TRAV+TIM administered TRAV once daily in the evening and TIM once daily in the morning using separate dosing aids.
Adherence with administered medication, as recorded by the dosing aids.
Mean ± SD patient age was 60 ± 10 years; most patients were male and white. Compared with TRAV+TIM (n = 40), patients receiving TTFC (n = 41) were consistently adherent on a greater percentage of days through month 12 (60% vs 43%). At months 1, 3, 6, and 12, 80% adherence was achieved by 71% vs 38%, 53% vs 30%, 45% vs 16%, and 32% vs 11% of patients receiving TTFC vs TRAV+TIM, respectively. Significantly more patients were adherent on ≥80% of days with TTFC compared with TRAV+TIM (P < .001 to P = .041). Both treatments reduced IOP from baseline, and no safety issues were identified in either group. Ocular hyperemia was the most common treatment-related adverse event (n = 3/group).
Patients receiving TTFC maintained better treatment adherence compared with patients receiving TRAV+TIM through 12 months of on-therapy evaluation. This suggests that, for patients requiring multiple IOP-lowering medications, a fixed combination may provide improved long-term adherence compared with unfixed therapy.
使用电子给药辅助装置,评估与分别包装的0.004%曲伏前列素和0.5%噻吗洛尔(TRAV+TIM;非固定组合)相比,固定组合的0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔(TTFC)的治疗依从性。
随机、对照、观察者盲法临床试验。
地点:美国两个临床研究点。
符合条件的患者为诊断为开角型青光眼或高眼压症的成年人。患者(n = 81)按1:1顺序随机分组,接受TTFC或TRAV+TIM治疗12个月。
TTFC每天早晨或晚上使用单一给药辅助装置给药一次。随机接受TRAV+TIM的患者,晚上使用单独的给药辅助装置每天给药一次TRAV,早晨每天给药一次TIM。
给药辅助装置记录的药物服用依从性。
患者平均年龄±标准差为60±10岁;大多数患者为男性且为白人。与TRAV+TIM组(n = 40)相比,接受TTFC治疗的患者(n = 41)在第12个月期间的多数天数里依从性持续更高(60%对43%)。在第1、3、6和12个月时,接受TTFC治疗的患者分别有71%、53%、45%和32%达到80%的依从性,而接受TRAV+TIM治疗的患者分别为38%、30%、16%和11%。与TRAV+TIM相比,接受TTFC治疗且在≥80%天数里依从的患者显著更多(P <.001至P = 0.041)。两种治疗均使眼压从基线水平降低,且两组均未发现安全问题。眼部充血是最常见的与治疗相关的不良事件(每组n = 3)。
在12个月的治疗评估期内,接受TTFC治疗的患者比接受TRAV+TIM治疗的患者保持了更好的治疗依从性。这表明,对于需要多种降低眼压药物的患者,与非固定组合治疗相比,固定组合可能提供更好的长期依从性。