Suppr超能文献

基于肿瘤分子谱的分子靶向治疗与常规治疗比较治疗难治性癌症患者的随机 II 期试验:来自 SHIVA 试验的交叉分析。

Randomized phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumor molecular profiling versus conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: cross-over analysis from the SHIVA trial.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris.

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):590-596. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw666.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies used the ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on genotype-matched treatment to PFS on genotype-unmatched treatment to assess the efficacy of therapy guided by patients' tumor molecular profiling. We evaluated the PFS ratio from patients who cross-over in the SHIVA trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary end point of the SHIVA trial was to compare PFS on molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) based on tumor molecular profiling and treatment at physician's choice (TPC) in patients with any kind of cancer who had failed standard-of-care therapy. The experimental treatment included only marketed MTAs given outside their indications according to a pre-specified treatment algorithm. Patients were allowed to cross-over at disease progression in both arms. Response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 at randomization and at cross-over. We evaluated the ratio of PFS on MTA (PFSMTA) to PFS on TPC (PFSTPC) in patients who crossed-over.

RESULTS

Among 741 patients enrolled in the SHIVA trial, 197 were randomized, and 95 crossed-over, including 70 patients from the TPC to the MTA arm and 25 patients from the MTA to the TPC arm. Two patients crossed-over in the TPC arm without disease progression. The PFSMTA/PFSTPC ratio exceeded 1.3 in 37% of patients who crossed-over from the TPC to the MTA arm. The PFSMTA/PFSTPC ratio exceeded 1.3 in 61% of patients who crossed-over from the MTA arm to the TPC arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The cross-over analysis of the SHIVA trial identified 37% of patients who crossed-over from TPC to MTA with a PFSMTA/PFSTPC ratio exceeding 1.3.

摘要

背景

几项研究使用无进展生存期(PFS)的比例(无进展生存与基因匹配治疗的比例)来评估患者肿瘤分子谱指导的治疗的疗效,该比例基于基因匹配治疗与基因不匹配治疗的 PFS。我们评估了 SHIVA 试验中交叉患者的 PFS 比值。

患者和方法

SHIVA 试验的主要终点是比较根据肿瘤分子谱进行分子靶向治疗(MTA)与根据医生选择(TPC)进行治疗的 PFS,入组的患者为接受标准治疗后进展的任何类型癌症患者。实验治疗仅包括根据预先指定的治疗算法,超出适应证使用的上市 MTA。在两个治疗组中,患者疾病进展时均允许交叉。根据 RECIST 1.1 在随机分组和交叉时评估反应。我们评估了交叉患者的 MTA 无进展生存期(PFSMTA)与 TPC 无进展生存期(PFSTPC)的比值。

结果

在 SHIVA 试验中,741 名患者入组,其中 197 名随机分组,95 名交叉,包括从 TPC 交叉到 MTA 组的 70 名患者和从 MTA 交叉到 TPC 组的 25 名患者。2 名患者在 TPC 组中无疾病进展时交叉。从 TPC 交叉到 MTA 组的患者中,37%的患者的 PFSMTA/PFSTPC 比值超过 1.3。从 MTA 组交叉到 TPC 组的患者中,61%的患者的 PFSMTA/PFSTPC 比值超过 1.3。

结论

SHIVA 试验的交叉分析发现,37%从 TPC 交叉到 MTA 的患者的 PFSMTA/PFSTPC 比值超过 1.3。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验