Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):576-582. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw648.
Bone metastases (BM) are rare in germ cell tumor (GCT) patients. Systematic data on risk factors, treatment and outcome are largely lacking.
A database created by an international consortium including 123 GCT patients with BM at primary diagnosis was retrospectively analysed. Survival estimates were calculated by the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank testing. Cox regression analysis was applied for risk factor analyses.
In our cohort of patients, BM at primary diagnosis more often affected multiple sites (61%) and BM as the only metastatic site were scarce (9%). Histology was non-seminoma in 77% and seminoma in 23% of patients. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 0-228), estimated median PFS and OS were 21 (range, 0-225) and 98 months (95%CI, 36-160), respective 2-year PFS and OS rates were 34% and 45%. Negative prognosticators in univariate analysis were a mediastinal primary (PFS; HR 1.92; 95%CI, 1.05-3.50; OS; HR 2.16; 95%CI, 1.14-4.09) and the presence of liver and/or brain metastases (PFS; HR 1.89; 95%CI, 1.13-3.17; OS; HR 1.91; 95%CI, 0.024) Seminomatous histology was the strongest predictor for favorable PFS (multivariate Cox regression; HR, 0.32; P=0.011) with respective 2-year PFS and OS rates of 68% and 75% compared with 24% and 36% for non-seminoma patients.
Outcome of GCT patients with primary metastatic bone disease is particularly poor in non-seminoma patients, even worse than the expected outcomes of the general IGCCCG 'poor prognosis' group. This series does not indicate that mutlimodal treatment improves the prognosis over stage-adapted chemotherapy alone, however, the statistical power of these results is limited due to low patient numbers in each specific subgroup.
在生殖细胞瘤(GCT)患者中,骨转移(BM)较为罕见。目前缺乏关于风险因素、治疗和预后的系统数据。
对一个由国际联盟创建的包含 123 例初诊时发生 BM 的 GCT 患者的数据库进行回顾性分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存估计,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。应用 Cox 回归分析进行风险因素分析。
在我们的患者队列中,BM 更常累及多个部位(61%),仅有 BM 转移的患者较为少见(9%)。组织学类型为非精原细胞瘤占 77%,精原细胞瘤占 23%。中位随访时间为 18 个月(范围 0-228),估计的中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为 21 个月(范围 0-225)和 98 个月(95%CI,36-160),相应的 2 年 PFS 和 OS 率分别为 34%和 45%。单因素分析中,不良预后因素包括纵隔原发肿瘤(PFS;HR 1.92;95%CI,1.05-3.50;OS;HR 2.16;95%CI,1.14-4.09)和肝转移及/或脑转移(PFS;HR 1.89;95%CI,1.13-3.17;OS;HR 1.91;95%CI,0.024)。精原细胞瘤组织学是 PFS 的最强预测因子(多因素 Cox 回归;HR,0.32;P=0.011),相应的 2 年 PFS 和 OS 率分别为 68%和 75%,而非精原细胞瘤患者分别为 24%和 36%。
非精原细胞瘤患者的 GCT 患者初诊时发生骨转移的预后尤其差,甚至比 IGCCCG 一般“预后不良”组的预期结果更差。由于每个亚组的患者数量较少,这些结果的统计效力有限,因此本研究结果并不能表明多模式治疗比基于分期的化疗单独治疗能改善预后。