Simić S, Marinković-Erić J
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1989 Jan-Feb;117(1-2):47-58.
The purpose of this investigation was to establish the attitude of Belgrade citizens towards the cost-sharing, and to determine for which services, in their opinion, the co-payment will be considered justified, as well as to analyze which part of the population will be exposed to such costs in the utilization of health care services. The city population considered to be the most suitable for the analysis consisted of 500 inhabitants of the city and suburban municipalities. The questionnaire filled in by 422 persons (response rate of 84.4%) was used as the investigation instrument. The results of this study show that the interviewed Belgrade population favours the solution which does not affect and jeopardize their living and health standards i.e. the increase of contribution rates payable from gross personal income and the introduction of new voluntary contributions for the health care. However, their attitude towards cost-sharing is not a priori negative. The answers obtained to the question whether cost-sharing will be justified in the present economic situation was not completely negative from the aspect of the current undertaking of such steps by the community.
本次调查的目的是确定贝尔格莱德市民对费用分担的态度,确定在他们看来哪些服务的共同支付是合理的,并分析在利用医疗保健服务时哪些人群将承受此类费用。被认为最适合进行分析的城市人口包括该市及郊区市镇的500名居民。以422人填写的问卷(回复率为84.4%)作为调查工具。这项研究的结果表明,接受采访的贝尔格莱德民众赞成不影响和危及他们生活及健康标准的解决方案,即提高从个人总收入中应支付的缴款率以及引入新的医疗保健自愿缴款。然而,他们对费用分担的态度并非先验地消极。从社会目前采取此类措施的情况来看,对于在当前经济形势下费用分担是否合理这一问题所获得的答案并非完全否定。