• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于使用医疗服务补充支付的民意调查

[Survey of public opinion on supplemental payment for the use of health services].

作者信息

Simić S, Marinković-Erić J

出版信息

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1989 Jan-Feb;117(1-2):47-58.

PMID:2799548
Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to establish the attitude of Belgrade citizens towards the cost-sharing, and to determine for which services, in their opinion, the co-payment will be considered justified, as well as to analyze which part of the population will be exposed to such costs in the utilization of health care services. The city population considered to be the most suitable for the analysis consisted of 500 inhabitants of the city and suburban municipalities. The questionnaire filled in by 422 persons (response rate of 84.4%) was used as the investigation instrument. The results of this study show that the interviewed Belgrade population favours the solution which does not affect and jeopardize their living and health standards i.e. the increase of contribution rates payable from gross personal income and the introduction of new voluntary contributions for the health care. However, their attitude towards cost-sharing is not a priori negative. The answers obtained to the question whether cost-sharing will be justified in the present economic situation was not completely negative from the aspect of the current undertaking of such steps by the community.

摘要

本次调查的目的是确定贝尔格莱德市民对费用分担的态度,确定在他们看来哪些服务的共同支付是合理的,并分析在利用医疗保健服务时哪些人群将承受此类费用。被认为最适合进行分析的城市人口包括该市及郊区市镇的500名居民。以422人填写的问卷(回复率为84.4%)作为调查工具。这项研究的结果表明,接受采访的贝尔格莱德民众赞成不影响和危及他们生活及健康标准的解决方案,即提高从个人总收入中应支付的缴款率以及引入新的医疗保健自愿缴款。然而,他们对费用分担的态度并非先验地消极。从社会目前采取此类措施的情况来看,对于在当前经济形势下费用分担是否合理这一问题所获得的答案并非完全否定。

相似文献

1
[Survey of public opinion on supplemental payment for the use of health services].关于使用医疗服务补充支付的民意调查
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1989 Jan-Feb;117(1-2):47-58.
2
Assessment of the effects of cost-sharing in Yugoslavia.
Med Care. 1988 Feb;26(2):148-58.
3
[Co-payment for public health care services--public opinion survey].[公共医疗保健服务的自付费用——民意调查]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2011;65(2):363-70.
4
Equity shortfalls & failure of the welfare state: community willingness to pay for health care at government facilities in Jehlum (Pakistan).公平性不足与福利国家的失败:巴基斯坦杰赫勒姆地区社区对政府医疗机构医疗保健服务的支付意愿
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2003 Oct-Dec;15(4):43-9.
5
Citizens' views on health insurance in Croatia.克罗地亚公民对健康保险的看法。
Croat Med J. 2002 Aug;43(4):417-24.
6
Out-of-pocket health spending by poor and near-poor elderly Medicare beneficiaries.贫困和接近贫困的老年医疗保险受益人的自付医疗费用。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):241-54.
7
Uninsured status and out-of-pocket costs at midlife.中年时的未参保状态与自付费用
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):911-32.
8
Economics and health: beyond financing.经济学与健康:超越融资
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1988;22(4):430-9.
9
[Survey for community attitudes toward people with mental illness].[社区对精神疾病患者态度的调查]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009 Feb;39(1):84-94. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.1.84.
10
Valuing a hypothetical cure for rheumatoid arthritis using the contingent valuation methodology: the patient perspective.使用条件价值评估法评估类风湿关节炎的假设性治愈方法:患者视角
J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar;32(3):443-53.