Teo Wendy Z W, Schalock Peter C
Department of Surgery (Dermatology), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017 Mar;7(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0162-1. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
Total hip and knee replacement surgery using metal alloy devices is common. Type IV allergic reactions to these implants occur, though infrequently. While uncommon, peri-implant metal allergic reactions may cause significant morbidity for the affected individual-including aseptic loosening, pseudotumor formation and frank device failure. It is challenging to predict who will have these reactions, even in those with established pre-implant metal allergy. At this time, the scientific literature clearly supports few conclusions. Despite this, we believe several conclusions can be made: routine pre-implant testing in asymptomatic individuals is not indicated; listen to patient's concerns about metal allergy if the concern arises; patch testing is probably the best pre- and post-implant screening test; post-implantation testing is controversial and even positive LTT or patch test does not definitively diagnose morbidity from a metal allergy; and complete recovery following revision placement of an immunologically inert device is diagnostic. More research is needed to scientifically approach this issue.
使用金属合金装置进行全髋关节和膝关节置换手术很常见。对这些植入物发生IV型过敏反应,虽然不常见。虽然不常见,但植入物周围金属过敏反应可能会给受影响的个体带来严重的发病情况,包括无菌性松动、假肿瘤形成和明显的装置故障。即使在植入前就已确诊金属过敏的患者中,预测谁会出现这些反应也具有挑战性。目前,科学文献明确支持的结论很少。尽管如此,我们认为可以得出几个结论:不建议对无症状个体进行常规植入前检测;如果患者提出对金属过敏的担忧,要予以倾听;斑贴试验可能是植入前和植入后最好的筛查试验;植入后检测存在争议,即使淋巴细胞转化试验(LTT)或斑贴试验呈阳性也不能明确诊断金属过敏导致的发病情况;而更换为免疫惰性装置后完全康复具有诊断意义。需要更多研究来科学地解决这个问题。