Tai Joanna Hong Meng, Canny Benedict J, Haines Terry P, Molloy Elizabeth K
a Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning , Deakin University , Geelong , Victoria , Australia.
b Faculty of Medicine , Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Apr-Jun;29(2):162-172. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1247000. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
Phenomenon: Peer learning has many benefits and can assist students in gaining the educational skills required in future years when they become teachers themselves. Peer learning may be particularly useful in clinical learning environments, where students report feeling marginalized, overwhelmed, and unsupported. Educational interventions often fail in the workplace environment, as they are often conceived in the "ideal" rather than the complex, messy real world. This work sought to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing peer learning activities in a clinical curriculum.
Previous peer learning research results and a matrix of empirically derived peer learning activities were presented to local clinical education experts to generate discussion around the realities of implementing such activities. Potential barriers and limitations of and strategies for implementing peer learning in clinical education were the focus of the individual interviews.
Thematic analysis of the data identified three key considerations for real-world implementation of peer learning: culture, epistemic authority, and the primacy of patient-centered care. Strategies for peer learning implementation were also developed from themes within the data, focusing on developing a culture of safety in which peer learning could be undertaken, engaging both educators and students, and establishing expectations for the use of peer learning. Insights: This study identified considerations and strategies for the implementation of peer learning activities, which took into account both educator and student roles. Reported challenges were reflective of those identified within the literature. The resultant framework may aid others in anticipating implementation challenges. Further work is required to test the framework's application in other contexts and its effect on learner outcomes.
现象:同伴学习有诸多益处,能够帮助学生获得未来自己成为教师时所需的教育技能。同伴学习在临床学习环境中可能特别有用,在这种环境中,学生们表示感到被边缘化、不堪重负且缺乏支持。教育干预措施在工作场所环境中常常失败,因为它们往往是在“理想”环境而非复杂、混乱的现实世界中构思出来的。这项研究旨在探索在临床课程中实施同伴学习活动的障碍和促进因素。
将以往同伴学习的研究结果以及一系列基于经验得出的同伴学习活动呈现给当地临床教育专家,以围绕开展此类活动的实际情况展开讨论。个人访谈聚焦于在临床教育中实施同伴学习的潜在障碍、限制因素及策略。
对数据进行主题分析确定了在现实世界中实施同伴学习的三个关键考量因素:文化、认知权威以及以患者为中心的护理的首要地位。还从数据中的主题出发制定了同伴学习实施策略,重点是营造一种能够开展同伴学习的安全文化,让教育工作者和学生都参与进来,并明确同伴学习使用方面的期望。见解:本研究确定了实施同伴学习活动的考量因素和策略,兼顾了教育工作者和学生的角色。报告的挑战反映了文献中所指出的那些挑战。由此产生的框架可能有助于其他人预见实施过程中的挑战。还需要进一步开展工作,以测试该框架在其他环境中的应用及其对学习者成果的影响。