Wu Qingxia, Wang Yan, Shi Ligang, Dong Li, Liu Mingbo, Dou Shewei, Zhu Shaocheng, Wang Meiyun, Shi Dapeng
From the *Radiological Department, †Pathological Department, ‡Obstetrics and Gynaecological Department, and §Radiotherapeutical Department, Henan Provincial People's Hospital and the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017 Jul/Aug;41(4):592-598. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000569.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the dependence of diffusion parameters on the b values adopted for intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and to investigate the application value of multiple diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential and biexponential models in subjects with a normal cervix and in cervical cancer patients.
A total of 120 female patients with cervical cancer and 21 female control subjects with a normal cervix underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with 13 b values (0-2000 s/mm) at 3 T. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (Dst), diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated by fitting with monoexponential and biexponential models at 2 different ranges of b values: 0 to 1000 and 0 to 2000 s/mm. A univariate analysis was performed to identify factors that could distinguish cervical carcinoma from normal cervical tissue. Parameters that correlated with the pathological grade and stage of cervical cancer were also evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of every parameter.
All the tested parameters, except the D* of the 2 different ranges of b value groups, significantly differed between the patients with cervical carcinoma and control subjects (P < 0.01). D2000, Dst2000, and D1000 showed comparable diagnostic value, with an area under the curve of 0.923, 0.909, and 0.907, respectively. Dst2000, D2000, Dst1000, and D1000 differed significantly among the 3 degrees of cervical stromal infiltration depth (P < 0.05).
D2000 and Dst2000 tended to outperform D1000 in terms of diagnostic efficiency, but there was no significant difference in their ability to differentiate cervical carcinoma from normal cervix. Cervical cancers with lower Dst and D values tended to have greater infiltration depth.
本研究旨在评估体素内不相干运动扩散加权磁共振成像中扩散参数对所采用b值的依赖性,并探讨从单指数和双指数模型获得的多个扩散参数在正常宫颈受试者和宫颈癌患者中的应用价值。
120例宫颈癌女性患者和21例正常宫颈女性对照者在3T下接受了具有13个b值(0 - 2000 s/mm²)的扩散加权磁共振成像检查。在2个不同的b值范围(0至1000和0至2000 s/mm²)内,通过单指数和双指数模型拟合计算标准表观扩散系数(Dst)、扩散系数(D)、伪扩散系数(D*)和灌注分数(f)。进行单因素分析以确定可区分宫颈癌与正常宫颈组织的因素。还评估了与宫颈癌病理分级和分期相关的参数。采用受试者操作特征曲线评估每个参数的诊断效能。
除2个不同b值组的D*外,所有测试参数在宫颈癌患者和对照者之间均有显著差异(P < 0.01)。D2000、Dst2000和D1000显示出相当的诊断价值,曲线下面积分别为0.923、0.909和0.907。Dst2000、D2000、Dst1000和D1000在3度宫颈基质浸润深度之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。
在诊断效能方面,D2000和Dst2000倾向于优于D1000,但它们区分宫颈癌与正常宫颈的能力无显著差异。Dst和D值较低的宫颈癌往往浸润深度更大。