Suppr超能文献

非放射性铬酸钠的研究。II. 输血后单标记和双标记52Cr/51Cr回收率的估计。

Studies with nonradioisotopic sodium chromate. II. Single- and double-label 52Cr/51Cr posttransfusion recovery estimations.

作者信息

Heaton W A, Keegan T, Hanbury C M, Holme S, Pleban P

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Medical College of Hampton Roads, Virginia.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1989 Oct;29(8):703-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29890020444.x.

Abstract

A recently developed nonradioisotopic 52Cr technique was used to measure either red cell volume or posttransfusion recovery of stored red cells. The experimental method uses Zeeman electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotometry to measure red cell chromium. Results from the 52Cr method were compared with those from 51Cr single-label and 125I-albumin/51Cr double-label procedures using 49-day AS-1 red cell concentrates drawn and prepared according to standard procedures. In the first group of five donors, red cell volume was estimated concurrently with both 52Cr-labeled fresh red cells and 125I-albumin. The latter measured plasma volume from which red cell volume was estimated on the basis of the hematocrit (125I red cell volume). 51Cr-labeled stored red cells were transfused to measure posttransfusion recoveries. The correlation between 52Cr and 125I red cell volumes was significant (r = 0.68, p less than 0.01), and, in this group, the differences were not significant (p less than 0.05). Twenty-four-hour posttransfusion recoveries of 51Cr-labeled stored red cells averaged 66 +/- 5 percent when measured with the 125I/51Cr technique and 69 +/- 8 percent when measured with the 52Cr/51Cr method. In the second group of five donors, red cell volume was estimated by the 125I-albumin technique, and the posttransfusion recovery of stored red cells was quantitated by 51Cr- and 52Cr-labeled stored cells simultaneously. In this group, posttransfusion recoveries with 125I/51Cr averaged 73 +/- 7 percent; with 125I/52Cr, they averaged 75 +/- 10 percent. Using the single-label method of calculation, recoveries averaged 76 +/- 7 and 75 +/- 10 percent for the 51Cr and 52Cr methods, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

一种最近开发的非放射性52Cr技术被用于测量红细胞体积或储存红细胞的输血后回收率。实验方法使用塞曼电热原子吸收分光光度法测量红细胞铬。将52Cr方法的结果与使用按照标准程序采集和制备的49天龄期的AS-1红细胞浓缩物的51Cr单标记和125I-白蛋白/51Cr双标记程序的结果进行比较。在第一组五名供体中,同时用52Cr标记的新鲜红细胞和125I-白蛋白估计红细胞体积。后者测量血浆体积,并在此基础上根据血细胞比容估计红细胞体积(125I红细胞体积)。输注51Cr标记的储存红细胞以测量输血后回收率。52Cr和125I红细胞体积之间的相关性显著(r = 0.68,p小于0.01),并且在该组中,差异不显著(p小于0.05)。当用125I/51Cr技术测量时,51Cr标记的储存红细胞的输血后24小时回收率平均为66±5%,当用52Cr/51Cr方法测量时为69±8%。在第二组五名供体中,通过125I-白蛋白技术估计红细胞体积,并同时用51Cr和52Cr标记的储存细胞定量储存红细胞的输血后回收率。在该组中,125I/51Cr的输血后回收率平均为73±7%;125I/52Cr的平均为75±10%。使用单标记计算方法,51Cr和52Cr方法的回收率分别平均为76±7%和75±10%。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验