Ketelaar Lizet, Wiefferink Carin H, Frijns Johan H M, Rieffe Carolien
1Dutch Foundation for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Developmental Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; 4Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; and 5University College London, Institute of Education, London, United Kingdom.
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):321-331. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000387.
Parenting a child who has a severe or profound hearing loss can be challenging and at times stressful, and might cause parents to use more adverse parenting styles compared with parents of hearing children. Parenting styles are known to impact children's social-emotional development. Children with a severe to profound hearing loss may be more reliant on their parents in terms of their social-emotional development when compared with their hearing peers who typically have greater opportunities to interact with and learn from others outside their family environment. Identifying the impact which parenting styles pertain on the social-emotional development of children who have cochlear implants (CIs) could help advance these children's well-being. Therefore, the authors compared parenting styles of parents with hearing children and of parents with children who have a CI, and examined the relations between parenting styles and two key aspects of children's social-emotional functioning: emotion regulation and empathy.
Ninety-two hearing parents and their children (aged 1 to 5 years old), who were either hearing (n = 46) or had a CI (n = 46), participated in this cross-sectional study. Parents completed questionnaires concerning their parenting styles (i.e., positive, negative and uninvolved), and regarding the extent to which their children expressed negative emotions (i.e., anger and sadness) and empathy. Furthermore, an emotion-regulation task measuring negative emotionality was administered to the children.
No differences in reported parenting styles were observed between parents of hearing children and parents of children with a CI. In addition, negative and uninvolved parenting styles were related to higher levels of negative emotionality in both groups of children. No relation was found between positive parenting and children's social-emotional functioning. Hearing status did not moderate these relationships. Language mediated the relationship between parenting styles and children's social-emotional functioning.
Children's hearing status did not impact parenting styles. This may be a result of the support that parents of children with a CI receive during their enrollment in the rehabilitation program preceding and after implantation. Rehabilitation programs should dedicate more attention to informing parents about the impact of parenting behaviors on children's social-emotional functioning. Offering parenting courses as part of the program could promote children's well-being. Future longitudinal research should address the directionality of the relations between parenting styles and children's social-emotional functioning.
养育一个重度或极重度听力损失的孩子可能具有挑战性,有时还会带来压力,这可能导致与听力正常孩子的父母相比,这些父母更多地采用不良养育方式。众所周知,养育方式会影响孩子的社会情感发展。与听力正常的同龄人相比,重度至极重度听力损失的孩子在社会情感发展方面可能更依赖父母,因为听力正常的同龄人通常有更多机会在家庭环境之外与他人互动并向他人学习。确定养育方式对接受人工耳蜗植入(CI)的孩子的社会情感发展有何影响,有助于促进这些孩子的幸福。因此,作者比较了听力正常孩子的父母和接受人工耳蜗植入孩子的父母的养育方式,并研究了养育方式与孩子社会情感功能的两个关键方面之间的关系:情绪调节和同理心。
92名听力正常的父母及其孩子(年龄在1至5岁之间)参与了这项横断面研究,其中孩子听力正常的有46名,接受人工耳蜗植入的有46名。父母完成了关于他们养育方式(即积极、消极和不参与)的问卷,以及关于他们孩子表达负面情绪(即愤怒和悲伤)和同理心程度的问卷。此外,还对孩子进行了一项测量负面情绪的情绪调节任务。
听力正常孩子父母和接受人工耳蜗植入孩子父母在报告的养育方式上没有观察到差异。此外,消极和不参与的养育方式与两组孩子更高水平的负面情绪有关。积极养育与孩子的社会情感功能之间没有发现关系。听力状况并没有调节这些关系。语言介导了养育方式与孩子社会情感功能之间的关系。
孩子的听力状况不会影响养育方式。这可能是因为接受人工耳蜗植入孩子的父母在植入前后参与康复项目期间得到了支持。康复项目应该更加关注告知父母养育行为对孩子社会情感功能的影响。作为项目的一部分提供养育课程可以促进孩子的幸福。未来的纵向研究应该探讨养育方式与孩子社会情感功能之间关系的方向性。