• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协同与非协同分割抗阻训练方案对抗阻训练男性急性神经肌肉表现的影响。

Effects of Synergist vs. NonSynergist Split Resistance Training Routines on Acute Neuromuscular Performance in Resistance-Trained Men.

机构信息

College of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.

Federal Institute of Sudeste of Minas Gerais, Rio Pomba, Brazil.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Dec;31(12):3482-3488. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001762.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001762
PMID:28002176
Abstract

Castanheira, RPM, Ferreira-Junior, JB, Celes, RS, Rocha-Junior, VA, Cadore, EL, Izquierdo, M, and Bottaro, M. Effects of synergist vs. nonsynergist split resistance training routines on acute neuromuscular performance in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 31(12): 3482-3488, 2017-The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of synergist (SN) vs. nonsynergist (NS) split resistance training routines on the acute neuromuscular performance of the elbow flexors in resistance-trained men. Fifteen resistance-trained men (age: 23.2 ± 4.0 years, height: 173.0 ± 0.08 cm, and body mass: 78.38 ± 9.31 kg) randomly performed 3 training routines separated by an interval of 7 days: (a) pull-pull exercises (SN), which included 6 sets of 10 repetition maximum (RM) of a seated row exercise followed by 4 sets of 10RM of the preacher biceps curl exercise; (b) push-pull exercises (NS), which included 6 sets of 10RM of the bench press exercise followed by 4 sets of 10RM of the preacher biceps curl exercise; and (c) Control, which included 4 sets of 10RM of the preacher biceps curl exercise. Elbow flexors peak torque, total work, and the amplitude of electromyography signal (EMG root mean square) were measured during the elbow flexor isokinetic exercise. Peak torque was 10.2 and 3.9% higher during Control condition when compared with the SN and NS conditions, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Peak torque was also 6.0% greater in the NS condition than the SN condition (p ≤ 0.05). Moreover, total work was 5.1% greater in the NS condition than the SN condition. Additionally, EMG findings did not differ among conditions (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a push and pull NS split routine is recommended to maximize elbow flexor training performance (i.e., lower acute loading effect) in trained subjects.

摘要

卡斯唐海拉,RPM,费雷拉-若热,JB,塞勒斯,RS,罗查-若热,VA,卡多雷,EL,伊齐亚韦德,M,和博塔罗,M. 协同与非协同分裂阻力训练方案对经过阻力训练的男性急性神经肌肉性能的影响。J 力量与调理研究 31(12):3482-3488,2017-本研究旨在评估协同(SN)与非协同(NS)分裂阻力训练方案对经过阻力训练的男性肘屈肌急性神经肌肉性能的影响。15 名经过阻力训练的男性(年龄:23.2 ± 4.0 岁,身高:173.0 ± 0.08cm,体重:78.38 ± 9.31kg)随机进行 3 种训练方案,每种方案之间间隔 7 天:(a)拉-拉练习(SN),包括 6 组 10 次最大重复(RM)的坐姿划船练习,随后进行 4 组 10RM 的牧师二头肌卷曲练习;(b)推-拉练习(NS),包括 6 组 10RM 的卧推练习,随后进行 4 组 10RM 的牧师二头肌卷曲练习;(c)对照组,包括 4 组 10RM 的牧师二头肌卷曲练习。在肘屈肌等速运动中测量肘屈肌峰值扭矩、总功和肌电图信号(EMG 均方根)的幅度。与 SN 和 NS 条件相比,对照组的峰值扭矩分别高 10.2%和 3.9%(p≤0.05)。与 SN 条件相比,NS 条件的峰值扭矩也高 6.0%(p≤0.05)。此外,NS 条件的总功比 SN 条件高 5.1%。此外,各条件之间的肌电图结果无差异(p>0.05)。总之,推荐采用推-拉 NS 分裂方案来最大限度地提高受过训练的受试者的肘屈肌训练性能(即,降低急性负荷效应)。

相似文献

1
Effects of Synergist vs. NonSynergist Split Resistance Training Routines on Acute Neuromuscular Performance in Resistance-Trained Men.协同与非协同分割抗阻训练方案对抗阻训练男性急性神经肌肉表现的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Dec;31(12):3482-3488. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001762.
2
Chest Press Exercises With Different Stability Requirements Result in Similar Muscle Damage Recovery in Resistance-Trained Men.对经过抗阻训练的男性而言,具有不同稳定性要求的卧推练习会导致相似的肌肉损伤恢复情况。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jan;31(1):71-79. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001453.
3
Dissociated Time Course of Muscle Damage Recovery Between Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises in Highly Resistance-Trained Men.高阻力训练男性单关节与多关节运动之间肌肉损伤恢复的解离时间进程
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Sep;29(9):2594-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000899.
4
Full Range of Motion Induces Greater Muscle Damage Than Partial Range of Motion in Elbow Flexion Exercise With Free Weights.在使用自由重量进行肘部屈曲运动时,全范围运动比部分范围运动引起更大的肌肉损伤。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):2223-2230. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001562.
5
Placing Greater Torque at Shorter or Longer Muscle Lengths? Effects of Cable vs. Barbell Preacher Curl Training on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy in Young Adults.在更短或更长的肌肉长度下施加更大的扭矩?电缆与杠铃牧师弯举训练对年轻人肌肉力量和肥大的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165859.
6
Seated row and biceps curl exercises present similar acute responses on muscle thickness, arm circumference, and peak force for elbow flexors after a resistance training session in recreationally-trained subjects.在有经验的受试者进行抗阻训练后,坐姿划船和二头肌弯举练习在肌肉厚度、臂围和屈肘峰值力方面表现出相似的急性反应。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Nov;60(11):1415-1422. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10996-4. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Influence of a Personal Trainer on Self-selected Loading During Resistance Exercise.私人教练对阻力训练中自我选择负荷的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1925-1930. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001663.
8
Efficacy of inertial training in elbow joint muscles: influence of different movement velocities.惯性训练对肘关节肌肉的功效:不同运动速度的影响。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 Mar;56(3):223-31. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
9
Comparison between constant and decreasing rest intervals: influence on maximal strength and hypertrophy.恒等和递减休息时间的比较:对最大力量和肥大的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1843-50. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddae4a.
10
Increased Neuromuscular Activity, Force Output, and Resistance Exercise Volume When Using 5-Minute Compared with 2-Minute Rest Intervals Between the Sets.与两组之间的 2 分钟休息时间相比,使用 5 分钟休息时间可增加神经肌肉活动、力量输出和抗阻运动的量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Sep 1;38(9):1527-1534. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004832. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Movement pattern definitions for resistance training behavior measurement in diabetes.糖尿病患者抗阻训练行为测量的运动模式定义
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024 Aug 27;5:1447595. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1447595. eCollection 2024.