• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用面部美学质量量表(FACE-Q)验证面部美容手术效果。

Validating Facial Aesthetic Surgery Results with the FACE-Q.

作者信息

Kappos Elisabeth A, Temp Mathias, Schaefer Dirk J, Haug Martin, Kalbermatten Daniel F, Toth Bryant A

机构信息

San Francisco, Calif.; and Basel, Switzerland.

From Toth Plastic Surgery; and the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic, and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):839-845. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003164.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003164
PMID:28002252
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In aesthetic clinical practice, surgical outcome is best measured by patient satisfaction and quality of life. For many years, there has been a lack of validated questionnaires. Recently, the FACE-Q was introduced, and the authors present the largest series of face-lift patients evaluated by the FACE-Q with the longest follow-up to date.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive patients were identified who underwent high-superficial musculoaponeurotic system face lifts, with or without additional facial rejuvenation procedures, between January of 2005 and January of 2015. Patients were sent eight FACE-Q scales and were asked to answer questions with regard to their satisfaction. Rank analysis of covariance was used to compare different subgroups.

RESULTS

The response rate was 38 percent. Combination of face lift with other procedures resulted in higher satisfaction than face lift alone (p < 0.05). Patients who underwent lipofilling as part of their face lift showed higher satisfaction than patients without lipofilling in three subscales (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Facial rejuvenation surgery, combining a high-superficial musculoaponeurotic system face lift with lipofilling and/or other facial rejuvenation procedures, resulted in a high level of patient satisfaction. The authors recommend the implementation of the FACE-Q by physicians involved in aesthetic facial surgery, to validate their clinical outcomes from a patient's perspective.

摘要

背景

在美容临床实践中,手术效果最好通过患者满意度和生活质量来衡量。多年来,一直缺乏经过验证的问卷。最近,引入了面部质量问卷(FACE-Q),作者展示了迄今为止通过FACE-Q评估且随访时间最长的最大规模的一系列面部提升患者。

方法

确定了200例连续患者,他们在2005年1月至2015年1月期间接受了高-浅表肌肉腱膜系统面部提升术,无论是否进行了其他面部年轻化手术。向患者发送了八个FACE-Q量表,并要求他们回答有关满意度的问题。使用协方差秩分析来比较不同亚组。

结果

回复率为38%。面部提升与其他手术联合进行比单独进行面部提升带来更高的满意度(p < 0.05)。在面部提升术中接受脂肪填充的患者在三个分量表中的满意度高于未接受脂肪填充的患者(p < 0.05)。

结论

面部年轻化手术,即将高-浅表肌肉腱膜系统面部提升与脂肪填充和/或其他面部年轻化手术相结合,带来了较高的患者满意度。作者建议参与美容面部手术的医生使用FACE-Q,从患者角度验证其临床效果。

相似文献

1
Validating Facial Aesthetic Surgery Results with the FACE-Q.使用面部美学质量量表(FACE-Q)验证面部美容手术效果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):839-845. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003164.
2
Turning Back the Clock: Artificial Intelligence Recognition of Age Reduction after Face-Lift Surgery Correlates with Patient Satisfaction.时光倒流:面部提升术后人工智能识别的年龄减小与患者满意度相关。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):45-54. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008020.
3
The measure of face-lift patient satisfaction: the Owsley Facelift Satisfaction Survey with a long-term follow-up study.面部提升患者满意度的衡量标准:Owsley 面部提升满意度调查及长期随访研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jul;126(1):245-257. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dbc2f0.
4
An Approach to Selection of Face-Lift Techniques for Different Types of Faces: An Analysis of 1000 Asian Patients Over 9 Years.针对不同脸型选择面部提升技术的方法:对9年间1000例亚洲患者的分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 1;93(2):153-162. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003982. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
5
Face-Lift Satisfaction Using the FACE-Q.使用面部质量问卷(FACE-Q)评估面部提升满意度。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug;136(2):239-242. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001412.
6
Long-term results of face lift surgery: patient photographs compared with patient satisfaction ratings.面部提升手术的长期效果:患者照片与患者满意度评分比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):253-262. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182362b55.
7
Outcome analysis in 93 facial rejuvenation patients treated with a deep-plane face lift.93 例采用深平面面部提升术进行面部年轻化治疗的患者的疗效分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):823-834. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed81f.
8
Midface Lift Plus Lipofilling Preferential in Patients with Negative Lower Eyelid Vectors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.中面部提升联合脂肪填充术在伴有下眼睑负向量的患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Jun;45(3):1012-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01971-0. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Assessing Improvement of Patient Satisfaction Following Facelift Surgery Using the FACE-Q Scales: A Prospective and Multicenter Study.采用 FACE-Q 量表评估面部提升术后患者满意度的改善:一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;43(2):370-375. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1277-9. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
10
Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale.《FACE-Q 衰老评估量表和患者感知年龄视觉模拟量表的制定和心理计量学评估》。
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Nov 1;33(8):1099-109. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13510170. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Deep Plane versus SMAS Facelift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.深层平面与SMAS面部提升术:系统评价与Meta分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05118-x.
2
Preservation Rhinoplasty Performed Simultaneously with Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: Last Evolution in Orthofacial Surgery.与双颌正颌手术同时进行的保留性隆鼻术:正颌外科的最新进展
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04919-4.
3
Evaluation of four regimens of methyl aminolevulinate mediated by red light to treat actinic keratoses: A randomized controlled clinical protocol.
四种外用氨基酮戊酸光动力疗法治疗光化性角化病的疗效评估:一项随机对照临床方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 14;20(2):e0318109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318109. eCollection 2025.
4
A Systematic Review of Questionnaires Assessing Patient Satisfaction in Plastic Surgery: Tools, Topics, and Surgical Types.评估整形手术患者满意度的问卷系统评价:工具、主题和手术类型
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 13;12(9):e6156. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006156. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
First Phase Development of a Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Midface Oncology.面中部肿瘤学患者报告结局量表的第一阶段开发
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 22;12(3):e5689. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005689. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
The Effects of a 2-W Laser on the Nasolabial Fold of Ageing Individuals Investigated by High-Frequency Ultrasonography: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.高频超声检查2-W激光对衰老个体鼻唇沟影响的非随机对照试验
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 20;13:e71. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.71. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Injected with a Cannula: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Controlled Study.使用套管注射弹性透明质酸填充剂的疗效和安全性:一项随机、评估者盲法、半脸对照研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Apr 6;16:959-972. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S402315. eCollection 2023.
8
Impact of Mandibular Angle Osteotomy Using a Geometric Mathematical Design on the Aesthetic Osteotomy Line: A Retrospective Observational Study.基于几何数学设计的下颌角截骨术对美学截骨线的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):1945-1956. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03117-w. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
9
Sexual Dissatisfaction after Hand Surgery.手部手术后的性不满。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct 24;10(10):e4600. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004600. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Evaluating the Compartment-Specific Effects in Superficial Facial Fat Compartments After Thread-Lifts by the Tensiometer and FACE-Q.通过张力计和面部质量评估问卷(FACE-Q)评估线雕后面部浅层脂肪室的特定室效应。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Jul 21;4:ojac065. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac065. eCollection 2022.