Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):155-162. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4494.
Persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that is treated with antiretroviral therapy have improved longevity but face an elevated risk of myocardial infarction (MI) due to common MI risk factors and HIV-specific factors. Despite these elevated MI rates, optimal methods to predict MI risks for HIV-infected persons remain unclear.
To determine the extent to which existing and de novo estimation tools predict MI in a multicenter HIV cohort with rigorous MI adjudication.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated the performance of standard of care and 2 new data-derived MI risk estimation models in 5 Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems sites across the United States where a multicenter clinical prospective cohort of 19 829 HIV-infected adults received care in inpatient and outpatient settings since 1995. The new risk estimation models were validated in a separate cohort from the derivation cohort.
Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, HIV viral load, CD4 lymphocyte count, statin use, antihypertensive use, and antiretroviral medication use were used to calculate predicted event rates.
We observed MI rates over the course of follow-up that were scaled to 10 years using the Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino Kaplan-Meier approach to account for dropout and loss to follow-up before 10 years.
Of the 11 288 patients with complete baseline data, 6904 were white and 9250 were men. Myocardial infarction rates were higher among black men (6.9 per 1000 person-years) and black women (7.2 per 1000 person-years) than white men (4.4 per 1000 person-years) and white women (3.3 per 1000 person-years), older participants (7.5 vs 2.2 MI per 1000 person-years for adults 40 years and older vs < 40 years old at study entry, respectively), and participants who were not virally suppressed (6.3 vs 4.7 per 1000 person-years for participants with and without detectable viral load, respectively). The 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations, which predict composite rates of MI and stroke, adequately discriminated MI risk (Harrell C statistic = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78). Two data-derived models incorporating HIV-specific covariates exhibited weak calibration in a validation sample and did not discriminate risk any better (Harrell C statistic = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78 and 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.79) than the Pooled Cohort Equations. The Pooled Cohort Equations were moderately calibrated in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Clinical Systems but predicted consistently lower MI rates.
The Pooled Cohort Equations discriminated MI risk and were moderately calibrated in this multicenter HIV cohort. Adding HIV-specific factors did not improve model performance. As HIV-infected cohorts capture and assess MI and stroke outcomes, researchers should revisit the performance of risk estimation tools.
接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者的寿命得到了改善,但由于常见的心肌梗死(MI)风险因素和 HIV 特异性因素,他们面临着更高的心肌梗死风险。尽管这些 MI 发生率较高,但对于 HIV 感染者,预测 MI 风险的最佳方法仍不清楚。
确定在一个具有严格 MI 裁决的多中心 HIV 队列中,现有的和新的估计工具在多大程度上可以预测 MI。
设计、地点和参与者:我们评估了标准护理和 2 种新的基于数据的 MI 风险估计模型在全美 5 个艾滋病研究网络综合临床系统中心的表现,该网络中有一个多中心前瞻性临床队列,其中 19829 名 HIV 感染的成年人在 1995 年以来的住院和门诊环境中接受了治疗。新的风险估计模型在来自推导队列的单独队列中进行了验证。
传统心血管风险因素、HIV 病毒载量、CD4 淋巴细胞计数、他汀类药物使用、抗高血压药物使用和抗逆转录病毒药物使用用于计算预测事件率。
我们观察了随访过程中的 MI 发生率,使用 Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino Kaplan-Meier 方法进行了调整,该方法考虑了 10 年内的辍学和失访情况,直到 10 年。
在具有完整基线数据的 11288 名患者中,6904 名是白人,9250 名是男性。黑人男性(每 1000 人年 6.9 例)和黑人女性(每 1000 人年 7.2 例)的 MI 发生率高于白人男性(每 1000 人年 4.4 例)和白人女性(每 1000 人年 3.3 例),年龄较大的参与者(40 岁及以上的成年人每 1000 人年 7.5 例 MI,而研究开始时<40 岁的成年人每 1000 人年 2.2 例 MI)和未被病毒抑制的参与者(每 1000 人年 6.3 例 MI,而每 1000 人年有和无可检测病毒载量的参与者分别为 4.7 例)。2013 年的综合队列方程预测 MI 和中风的综合发生率,充分区分了 MI 风险(Harrell C 统计量=0.75;95%CI,0.71-0.78)。两个包含 HIV 特异性协变量的数据衍生模型在验证样本中的校准效果不佳,并且没有更好地区分风险(Harrell C 统计量=0.72;95%CI,0.67-0.78 和 0.73;95%CI,0.68-0.79)比综合队列方程。综合队列方程在艾滋病研究网络的临床系统中适度校准,但预测的 MI 率始终较低。
综合队列方程在这个多中心 HIV 队列中区分了 MI 风险,并且适度校准。增加 HIV 特异性因素并没有改善模型性能。随着 HIV 感染队列捕获和评估 MI 和中风结果,研究人员应该重新审视风险估计工具的性能。