Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Department of Medicine, Section on Hospital Medicine, Wisconsin College of Medicine, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
J Hypertens. 2024 Sep 1;42(9):1573-1580. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003762. Epub 2024 May 3.
The relationship between self-rated health (SRH) and cardiovascular events in individuals with hypertension, but without diabetes mellitus, is understudied.
We performed a post hoc analysis of data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). SRH was categorized into excellent, very good, good and fair/poor. Using multivariable Cox regression, we estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of SRH with both all-cause mortality and a composite of cardiovascular events (the primary outcome), which was defined to include myocardial infarction (MI), other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, and cardiovascular death.
We included 9319 SPRINT participants (aged 67.9 ± 9 years, 35.6% women) with a median follow-up of 3.8 years. Compared with SRH of excellent, the risk [hazard ratio (95% CI)] of the primary outcome associated with very good, good, and fair/poor SRH was 1.11(0.78-1.56), 1.45 (1.03-2.05), and 1.87(1.28-2.75), respectively. Similarly, compared with SRH of excellent, the risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (95% CI)] associated with very good, good, and fair/poor SRH was 1.13 (0.73-1.76), 1.72 (1.12-2.64), and 2.11 (1.32-3.38), respectively. Less favorable SRH (LF-SRH) was also associated with a higher risk of each component of the primary outcome and serious adverse events (SAE).
Among individuals with hypertension, SRH is independently associated with the risk of incident cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and SAE. Our study suggest that guidelines should consider the potential significance of including SRH in the clinical history of patients with hypertension.
自我报告的健康状况(SRH)与高血压但无糖尿病患者的心血管事件之间的关系研究较少。
我们对 SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)的数据进行了事后分析。SRH 分为优秀、很好、好和一般/差。使用多变量 Cox 回归,我们估计了 SRH 与全因死亡率和心血管事件综合(主要终点)的关联的风险比和 95%置信区间(CI),主要终点定义为包括心肌梗死(MI)、其他急性冠状动脉综合征、卒中和急性失代偿性心力衰竭以及心血管死亡。
我们纳入了 9319 名 SPRINT 参与者(年龄 67.9±9 岁,35.6%为女性),中位随访时间为 3.8 年。与 SRH 优秀相比,SRH 很好、好和一般/差与主要终点相关的风险[风险比(95%CI)]分别为 1.11(0.78-1.56)、1.45(1.03-2.05)和 1.87(1.28-2.75)。同样,与 SRH 优秀相比,SRH 很好、好和一般/差与全因死亡率相关的风险[风险比(95%CI)]分别为 1.13(0.73-1.76)、1.72(1.12-2.64)和 2.11(1.32-3.38)。较差的 SRH(LF-SRH)也与主要终点和严重不良事件(SAE)的每个组成部分的风险增加相关。
在高血压患者中,SRH 与心血管事件、全因死亡率和 SAE 的发生风险独立相关。我们的研究表明,指南应该考虑将 SRH 纳入高血压患者临床病史的潜在意义。