Castro-Martín Eduardo, Ortiz-Comino Lucía, Gallart-Aragón Tania, Esteban-Moreno Bernabé, Arroyo-Morales Manuel, Galiano-Castillo Noelia
Department of Physical Therapy, Instituto Mixto Universitario Deporte y Salud (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Center Medical Traffic SL, Granada, Spain.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):832-840. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
To (1) investigate the immediate effects of myofascial induction (MI), with placebo electrotherapy as a control, on perceived pain, cervical/shoulder range of motion (ROM), and mood state in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) with shoulder/arm morbidity; and (2) examine the relationships between pain modifications and cervical/shoulder ROM on the side affected by breast cancer.
Randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.
Physical therapy laboratory.
BCSs (N=21) who had a diagnosis of stage I-IIIA breast cancer and had completed adjuvant therapy (except hormonal treatment).
During each session, the BCSs received either an MI (fascial unwinding) intervention focused on the upper limb area following the Pilat approach or placebo pulsed shortwave therapy (control group). Each session lasted 30 minutes, and an adequate washout period of 4 weeks between sessions was established.
The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and anxiety, shoulder-cervical goniometry for ROM, the Profile of Mood States for psychological distress, and the Attitudes Towards Massage Scale were used.
An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed significant time × group interactions for VAS affected arm (P=.031) but not for VAS cervical (P=.332), VAS nonaffected arm (P=.698), or VAS anxiety (P=.266). The ANCOVA also revealed significant interactions for affected shoulder flexion (P<.001), abduction (P<.001), external rotation (P=.004), and internal rotation (P=.001). Significant interactions for affected cervical rotation (P=.022) and affected cervical lateral flexion (P=.038) were also found. A significant negative correlation was found between changes in VAS affected arm and shoulder/arm internal rotation ROM (r=-.46; P=.03).
A single MI session decreases pain intensity and improves neck-shoulder ROM to a greater degree than placebo electrotherapy for BCSs experiencing pain.
(1)以安慰剂电疗法作为对照,研究肌筋膜诱导(MI)对患有肩部/手臂疾病的乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)的疼痛感知、颈/肩活动范围(ROM)和情绪状态的即时影响;(2)研究乳腺癌患侧疼痛改善与颈/肩ROM之间的关系。
随机、单盲、安慰剂对照交叉研究。
物理治疗实验室。
诊断为I-IIIA期乳腺癌且已完成辅助治疗(激素治疗除外)的BCS(N = 21)。
在每次治疗期间,BCS接受以下两种治疗之一:采用普拉提方法针对上肢区域的MI(筋膜放松)干预,或安慰剂脉冲短波疗法(对照组)。每次治疗持续30分钟,两次治疗之间设定了4周的适当洗脱期。
使用疼痛和焦虑视觉模拟量表(VAS)、ROM的肩颈测角法、心理困扰的情绪状态剖面图以及按摩态度量表。
协方差分析(ANCOVA)显示,受影响手臂的VAS存在显著的时间×组交互作用(P = 0.031),但颈部VAS(P = 0.332)、未受影响手臂的VAS(P = 0.698)或焦虑VAS(P = 0.266)不存在显著的时间×组交互作用。ANCOVA还显示,受影响的肩部前屈(P < 0.001)、外展(P < 0.001)、外旋(P = 0.004)和内旋(P = 0.001)存在显著交互作用。还发现受影响的颈椎旋转(P = 0.022)和受影响的颈椎侧屈(P = 0.038)存在显著交互作用。受影响手臂的VAS变化与肩/臂内旋ROM之间存在显著负相关(r = -0.46;P = 0.03)。
对于经历疼痛的BCS,单次MI治疗比安慰剂电疗法能更大程度地降低疼痛强度并改善颈肩ROM。