Suppr超能文献

食管癌治疗的现状与未来展望

Current Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer Treatment.

作者信息

Sohda Makoto, Kuwano Hiroyuki

机构信息

Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb 20;23(1):1-11. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.16-00162. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Abstract

The local control effect of esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection (3FLD) is reaching its limit pending technical advancement. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) by thoracotomy is slowly gaining acceptance due to advantages in short-term outcomes. Although the evidence is slowly increasing, MIE is still controversial. Also, the results of treatment by surgery alone are limiting, and multimodality therapy, which includes surgical and non-surgical treatment options including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endoscopic treatment, has become the mainstream therapy. Esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard treatment for clinical stages II/III (except for T4) esophageal cancer, whereas chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is regarded as the standard treatment for patients who wish to preserve their esophagus, those who refuse surgery, and those with inoperable disease. CRT is also usually selected for clinical stage IV esophageal cancer. On the other hand, with the spread of CRT, salvage esophagectomy has traditionally been recognized as a feasible option; however, many clinicians oppose the use of surgery due to the associated unfavorable morbidity and mortality profile. In the future, the improvement of each treatment result and the establishment of individual strategies are important although esophageal cancer has many treatment options.

摘要

在技术取得进展之前,三野淋巴结清扫术(3FLD)食管癌切除术的局部控制效果已接近极限。开胸微创食管癌切除术(MIE)由于短期疗效优势正逐渐被接受。尽管相关证据在缓慢增加,但MIE仍存在争议。此外,单纯手术治疗的效果有限,包括手术及化疗、放疗和内镜治疗等非手术治疗选择的多模式治疗已成为主流治疗方法。新辅助化疗(NAC)后行食管癌切除术是临床II/III期(T4除外)食管癌的标准治疗方法,而同步放化疗(CRT)被视为希望保留食管的患者、拒绝手术的患者以及无法手术的患者的标准治疗方法。CRT通常也用于临床IV期食管癌。另一方面,随着CRT的推广,挽救性食管癌切除术传统上被认为是一种可行的选择;然而,由于相关的不良发病率和死亡率,许多临床医生反对采用手术。未来,尽管食管癌有多种治疗选择,但提高每种治疗效果并制定个体化策略很重要。

相似文献

1
Current Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer Treatment.
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb 20;23(1):1-11. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.16-00162. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
2
Management of Patients With Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cancer of the Esophagus.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(2):437-451. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.048. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
3
Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.
Surg Today. 2020 Jan;50(1):12-20. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01878-7. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
5
The 3-Hole Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Safe Procedure Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Summer;27(2):205-15. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
6
Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer.
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;100(6):442-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.21353.
7
[Therapeutic strategies for advanced respectable esophageal cancer].
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 Nov;109(6):333-7.
9
Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.062. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitigation of radiation-induced esophageal fibrosis by macrophage-targeted phosphatidylserine-containing liposomes with partial PEGylation.
Bioact Mater. 2025 Jun 18;52:574-587. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.06.021. eCollection 2025 Oct.
4
Preoperative inspiratory muscle training preserved diaphragmatic excursion after esophagectomy: a randomized-controlled trial.
Esophagus. 2025 Jul;22(3):331-339. doi: 10.1007/s10388-025-01123-w. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
6
Inspiratory Muscle Training Before Esophagectomy Increases Diaphragmatic Excursion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):9352-9361. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16180-1. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

8
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy in prone versus lateral decubitus position: A comparative study.
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jan-Mar;12(1):10-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.171954.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验